Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: af_vet_rr
He should know that Lt. Col. Bailey was giving him an illegal order.

An illegal order?

He was ordered by his superior not to divulge information - an order that his superior had every legal right to give and which he had every legal obligation to comply with.

An illegal order is an order in which a superior instructs a subordinate to violate the laws of war.

I am unaware of any provision in the UCMJ or the Geneva Convention which makes it compulsory for a officer to immediately report the circumstances of a soldier's death to his family.

The Army, as a matter of policy, traditionally waits until a uniformed service member can contact the family in person.

If not telling the family immediately is illegal, the Army has been routinely breaking the law for centuries.

14 posted on 04/24/2007 12:15:48 PM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: wideawake

There is a lot more too this story (and we may never know the truth) - if I can find the article, I’ll post a link, but there were soldiers who were told not to reveal what they knew - that constitutes an illegal order when you have an ongoing investigation. It’s very close to tampering with witnesses (and some legal types would argue that it was).


38 posted on 04/24/2007 1:28:07 PM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson