Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Planned Parenthood Organizes Protests in Favour of Gruesome Partial Birth Abortion Procedure
LifeSiteNews ^ | 4/25/07 | Peter J. Smith

Posted on 04/25/2007 4:11:37 PM PDT by wagglebee

NEW YORK, April 25, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) – Planned Parenthood called for a day of nationwide rallies and demonstrations in protest of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision to uphold the federal abortion ban on the gruesome partial-birth abortion procedure.

In a press release, Planned Parenthood said it was summoning all pro-abortion advocates to “express outrage” today on the third anniversary of the abortion rally, the 2004 March for Women’s Lives.

"Last Wednesday’s decision by the U.S. Supreme Court to uphold the federal abortion ban in its entirety represents a serious setback for women’s health and safety, and is truly ‘an alarming decision,’ as Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote in her dissent," said Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA) President Cecile Richards.

Richards complained that the “decision ... turns back the clock on 30 years of Supreme Court precedent.”

“This is the first time that the Supreme Court has ever upheld a restriction on abortion without a health exception,” she said, adding that “the American people won’t stand for it [abortion restrictions].”

However Planned Parenthood has used the aegis of the Supreme Court to stymie the democratic expression of a majority of the American people, who for years have supported implementing significant restrictions on abortion. There is especially strong public opinion against very late term partial-birth abortion which is overwhelmingly seen as a barbaric infanticide type of abortion.

A March 2006 FoxNews poll showed Americans favored banning partial-birth abortion 61% to 27%. A Gallup Poll in January 2003 showed Americans wanted the practice prohibited except in life threatening cases 70% to 25%. Statistics against the procedure have tended to rise as more Americans have become educated as to what the procedure actually entails and have seen explicit drawings of the procedure.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: moralabsolutes; partialbirthabortion; plannedparenthood; prolife
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
"Last Wednesday’s decision by the U.S. Supreme Court to uphold the federal abortion ban in its entirety represents a serious setback for women’s health and safety, and is truly ‘an alarming decision,’ as Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote in her dissent," said Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA) President Cecile Richards.

These people are deranged if they think the slaughter of a child CAPABLE OF LIVING OUTSIDE THE WOMB is a "setback" (unless they mean the culture of death).

1 posted on 04/25/2007 4:11:41 PM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cgk; Coleus; cpforlife.org; narses; 8mmMauser

Pro-Life Ping


2 posted on 04/25/2007 4:12:11 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 230FMJ; 49th; 50mm; 69ConvertibleFirebird; Alexander Rubin; An American In Dairyland; Antoninus; ...
Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee or little jeremiah to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]


3 posted on 04/25/2007 4:15:48 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Abortion rights groups claim that the partial birth abortion is sometimes the safest procedure for a woman. Dr. Kenneth Killborn, co-chair of Practicing American Physicians for Abortion (PAPA), defended the procedure. “If we were to do the dilation and extraction and pull the fetus out without crushing its skull there’s a chance it might live,” Killborn said. “Even if the woman were not required to take responsibility for the resulting child, she would still be burdened with the knowledge that she was a mother. This could be traumatic and damaging to her health. That’s why we must have a ‘health of the mother’ exception to any proposed limit to the right to an abortion.”

read more...

http://www.azconservative.org/Semmens1.htm


4 posted on 04/25/2007 4:20:27 PM PDT by John Semmens
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

Dr. Kenneth Killborn, co-chair of Practicing American Physicians for Abortion (PAPA), defended the procedure.

What an appropriate name.


5 posted on 04/25/2007 4:25:38 PM PDT by freedomfiter2 (Duncan Hunter '08 Pro family, pro life, pro second Amendment, not a control freak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: freedomfiter2
“Even if the woman were not required to take responsibility for the resulting child, she would still be burdened with the knowledge that she was a mother. This could be traumatic and damaging to her health."

- Dr. Kenneth Killborn (Is that his real name?)

Women who have abortions are often burdened with the knowledge that they have killed their own innocent offspring. How's that for "traumatic and damaging to her health"?

6 posted on 04/25/2007 4:36:18 PM PDT by wai-ming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: freedomfiter2

“Even if the woman were not required to take responsibility for the resulting child, she would still be burdened with the knowledge that she was a mother. This could be traumatic and damaging to her health. That’s why we must have a ‘health of the mother’ exception to any proposed limit to the right to an abortion.”

So a woman would carry the burden of knowing that she was a mother. What in the sam hill are they talking about? The mere knowledge that a woman knows she is pregnant and will be a mother is traumatic and damaging to her health? Her mental health? Her physical health? What kind of reasoning is this?


7 posted on 04/25/2007 4:37:05 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

So a woman would carry the burden of knowing that she was a mother. What in the sam hill are they talking about? The mere knowledge that a woman knows she is pregnant and will be a mother is traumatic and damaging to her health? Her mental health? Her physical health? What kind of reasoning is this?

Don’t ask me. I have enough trouble following the logic of sane people sometimes. Twisted people at PP are just twisted.


8 posted on 04/25/2007 4:44:17 PM PDT by freedomfiter2 (Duncan Hunter '08 Pro family, pro life, pro second Amendment, not a control freak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
"There is especially strong public opinion against very late term partial-birth abortion which is overwhelmingly seen as a barbaric infanticide type of abortion."

And against barbaric politicans who do not condemn this procedure.

9 posted on 04/25/2007 4:46:14 PM PDT by ex-snook ("But above all things, truth beareth away the victory.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I just posted this link on a different thread. Might be of interest, or of more disturbance..

http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/NEJMp078084?query=TOC


10 posted on 04/25/2007 4:49:10 PM PDT by Radix (I haven't seen Senator Johnson or Governor Corzine on the TV lately.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens
Even if the woman were not required to take responsibility for the resulting child, she would still be burdened with the knowledge that she was a mother. This could be traumatic and damaging to her health.

And the knowledge that she has murdered an innocent child is not traumatic and damaging to her health?

11 posted on 04/25/2007 4:49:53 PM PDT by Alouette (Learned Mother of Zion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

They need to look in the mirror and realize that they themselves were once a fetus(baby).


12 posted on 04/25/2007 4:55:44 PM PDT by taxesareforever (Never forget Matt Maupin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I suggest a new name for PP, “Premeditated Infanticide”.


13 posted on 04/25/2007 5:08:38 PM PDT by SampleMan (Islamic tolerance is practiced by killing you last.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
...she would still be burdened with the knowledge that she was a mother.

Isn't it odd that the very same reason--"health of the mother"--could be used to outlaw abortion? What about the post-abortive women--more than half of them--who suffer psychologically once they realize that they are mothers? once they realize what they did to their baby? How would the good Dr Kill(emallbeforetheyre)born ease that particular burden, I wonder?

14 posted on 04/25/2007 5:15:50 PM PDT by grellis (Femininist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
The mere knowledge that a woman knows she is pregnant and will be a mother is traumatic and damaging to her health? Her mental health? Her physical health? What kind of reasoning is this?

It is liberal reasoning.

15 posted on 04/25/2007 5:28:09 PM PDT by TruthShallSetYouFree (Abortion is to family planning what bankruptcy is to financial planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
“This is the first time that the Supreme Court has ever upheld a restriction on abortion without a health exception,” she said, adding that “the American people won’t stand for it [abortion restrictions].”

I wonder if these idiots know that the vast majority of Americans are against partial birth abortion.

16 posted on 04/25/2007 5:32:00 PM PDT by mtg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mtg

That’s what I’m thinking...best if they go ahead and protest this, look what they’re protesting about.


17 posted on 04/25/2007 5:34:42 PM PDT by Baladas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Coleus; nickcarraway; narses; Mr. Silverback; Canticle_of_Deborah; TenthAmendmentChampion; ...
a surprising development /sarc

Pro-Life PING

Please FreepMail me if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.

18 posted on 04/25/2007 5:49:10 PM PDT by cpforlife.org (A Catholic Respect Life Curriculum is available at KnightsForLife.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I’m pro-choice, although being a guy it feels silly to say so. But partial birth abortion is murder, plain and simple. And to claim it’s necessary to save the life of the mother is insane.


19 posted on 04/25/2007 5:50:11 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cpforlife.org; G S Patton; Gumdrop; trustandhope; MarkBsnr; pblax8; oakcon; newbie 10-21-00; ...
+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic Ping List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to all note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of interest.

20 posted on 04/25/2007 6:00:05 PM PDT by narses ("Freedom is about authority." - Rudolph Giuliani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson