Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Shooter 2.5

people visit shrinks because they have eating disorders,are afraid to fly,or wash their hands 800 times a day-i don’t think they will be denied gun ownership-i believe the NRA will make sure it only applies to dangerous psychotics who have been found dangerous by a court after due process-i am a no compromise gun rights advocate but paranoid schizophrenics with violent tendencies shouldn’t be armed, likewise illegal aliens and convicted felons-schumer better not try to tack on extras-if he ate some bad dog food it wouldn’t cause me to shed a tear-mccarthy is an idiot who acts like she’s the only person in this country who had a relative murdered-the european trash media has been making remarks about our gun culture-how about the fact that the euro-pigs have been arming the third world for decades and making obscene profits at it?that’s how they can afford smelly cheese and kiddie porn and all the other wonderful stuff in their degenerate societies-now is the time to get all the ammo you can-5.56mm amd .308 are becoming scarce due to military demand-i hear that even 7.62x39 is going to rise in price soon


66 posted on 04/27/2007 7:16:18 PM PDT by steamroller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: steamroller

You have two approaches to this issue. The GOA standpoint where they say taking away guns from ANYONE is a bad thing and the NRA saying public opinion isn’t with us on this one so let’s try to minimize the damage.


68 posted on 04/27/2007 7:37:08 PM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (NRA - Hunter '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: steamroller
people visit shrinks because they have eating disorders,are afraid to fly,or wash their hands 800 times a day-i don’t think they will be denied gun ownership-i believe the NRA will make sure it only applies to dangerous psychotics who have been found dangerous by a court after due process-i am a no compromise gun rights advocate but paranoid schizophrenics with violent tendencies shouldn’t be armed,

And anyone, dangerously psychotic paranoid schizophrenics or not, who is setting off to kill someone, or lots of someones, is not going to be deterred by some "law". They'll find a way to get a firearm, or just use easily obtainable high energy materials, like gasoline, fertilizer and fuel, TATP, or what have you. The only ones affected by this sort of law will be the law abiding, just like other gun control laws.

Cho, the ostensible trigger for the new consideration of this law (which was proposed *before* the VaTech rampage), planned his actions quite well. The first two murders were likely a distraction to suck to the police over to that side of campus, giving him more time to "make his bones" by killing a whole bunch more a couple of hours later. He had most of the materials he mailed to MSNBC during those couple of hours, already made up. If he could not have gotten his Glock at a gun store, he'd have found a way to buy one on the street. (His hometown, that is where his parents lived, is closer to DC than to the VaTech campus, and you know he could get one in that area, no background check required. But even if he couldn't or didn't go that route, he still would have found a way to his 15 minutes of fame.

He probably would have tried to take the whole building down, and killed even more. And still, as after OK City, there would have been calls for more gun control. (No one ever said that gun grabbers were logical).

74 posted on 04/27/2007 10:00:07 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson