Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Ominously, Riedel added that Iran would view an Israeli strike with American-made warplanes as no different than a U.S. strike, and the attack could touch off a war with Iran.

Hence we will attack WITH Israel.
The main object to learn from this is that the first strike
MUST MUST be decisive and utterly complete, no wussy, half ass drop a few smart bombs and hope they get the message kind of liberal example of war, but as total as we can make it from the get go.

So if Iran considers an Israeli strike as a U.S.strike
should we not consider an Al Quida attack as an Iranian one?


8 posted on 04/27/2007 10:19:41 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: tet68

Personally I feel the Iranians are closer than even these
reports. I have no proof but more of a fingertip feeling.


9 posted on 04/27/2007 10:21:59 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: tet68

Considering they have admitted they have senior Al Qaeda under “house arrest,” and do not allow us to talk to them... we’ve had plenty of reasons after 9/11 and before Iraq to strike them.


14 posted on 04/28/2007 1:19:48 PM PDT by PghBaldy (Reporter: Are you surprised? Nancy Pelosi: No. My eyes always look like this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson