To: jdm
Frankly, I think that WE need to withdraw from (1) the United Nations AND (2) the World Banque.
Phuque both of these ANTI-AMERICA, ANTI-FREEDOM (except where it financially “suits” them) “organizations”......
7 posted on
04/30/2007 8:06:53 PM PDT by
Howie66
(To the RAT Party: How can I question your patriotism? You have none, so what's your point?)
To: Howie66
I agree. Its all about the sovereignty. Every time we sign on the dotted line, other nations have influence over our decisions.
8 posted on
04/30/2007 8:14:05 PM PDT by
uptoolate
(If it sounds absurd, 51% chance it was sarcasm.)
To: Howie66
Frankly, I think that WE need to withdraw from (1) the United Nations AND (2) the World Banque. I understand the first, but why the second? I mean the World Bank lends money to poor countries and actually gets the money paid back - as this article points out. The US has effective control over the WB. Why pull out?
32 posted on
05/01/2007 1:49:02 AM PDT by
Einigkeit_Recht_Freiheit
(I don't care what side of the debate you are on: Weather is not Climate)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson