Skip to comments.
'Open skies' allow airline industry jobs to fly away
San Francisco Chronicle ^
| April 30, 2007
| Edward Wytkind
Posted on 05/01/2007 7:44:38 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer
Today, the United States is expected to formally approve a new "open skies" aviation trade deal with the European Union (EU). The Bush administration has failed to satisfy congressional critics who question the pact's impact on long-standing law and policy limiting foreign control of our airlines. And aviation workers are deeply concerned that this agreement is a down payment on a broader Bush administration strategy to allow foreign control of our airlines and decision making that threatens thousands of American jobs.
This is not hyperbole. Led by Transportation Committee Chairman Rep. James Oberstar, key House members in both parties wrote in March that the agreement's impact is "ambiguous" and "may lead to a change in U.S. law and policy to permit greater foreign control of U.S. airlines." They also warned that legislation may be necessary to ensure continuation of existing policies.
The agreement would allow foreign carriers to enter into franchise arrangements with U.S. airlines. By allowing control over "operational matters" of the U.S. franchisee, it could mean foreign control over fleet acquisitions, route planning, schedules and pricing. Our laws bar foreign interests from controlling these decisions. What if a foreign carrier directs franchisee operations in a way to maximize its own economic objectives? For example, a European airline could have its U.S. partner feed traffic to its international flights, rather than competing more broadly in the U.S. market or developing international services itself. If a foreign airline has control over maintenance decisions, could even more work be shipped overseas to repair stations that may not meet the highest safety and security standards? Could aircraft purchasing decisions favor Boeing's rival, Airbus? Good questions, but to date, no real answers.
(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; domesticeconomy; jobloss; publicsafety; sovereignty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
For discussion
To: hedgetrimmer
The agreement would allow foreign carriers to enter into franchise arrangements with U.S. airlines. Does this mean JapanAir can finally take over some US airlines and make them not royally suck?
2
posted on
05/01/2007 7:47:12 AM PDT
by
JohnnyZ
("I respect and will protect a woman's right to choose" -- Mitt Romney, April 2002)
To: hedgetrimmer
What if a foreign carrier directs franchisee operations in a way to maximize its own economic objectives? What if a domestic carrier does?
3
posted on
05/01/2007 7:53:30 AM PDT
by
Rodney King
(No, we can't all just get along.)
To: hedgetrimmer
A lot of bias in this article.
To see the ill effects of bad trade policy, look no further than our manufacturing industries where failure by our government to take action against illegal trade practices has killed off U.S. companies, ruined local economies and destroyed jobs. For example, from 1997 to 2004, at least 45 steel companies filed for bankruptcy
And yet I have been reading for many, many years how the US steel companies have not been competitive, preferring to rely on protectionism instead.
4
posted on
05/01/2007 7:53:38 AM PDT
by
sionnsar
(trad-anglican.faithweb.com |Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
To: JohnnyZ
Does this mean JapanAir can finally take over some US airlines and make them not royally suck? That would sure be nice!
5
posted on
05/01/2007 7:54:17 AM PDT
by
sionnsar
(trad-anglican.faithweb.com |Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
To: hedgetrimmer
For example, a European airline could have its U.S. partner feed traffic to its international flights, rather than competing more broadly in the U.S. market or developing international services itself.
Sacre bleu!
6
posted on
05/01/2007 7:55:54 AM PDT
by
1rudeboy
To: sionnsar
And yet I have been reading for many, many years how the US steel companies have not been competitive, preferring to rely on protectionism instead.
Not competitive with the ruthless practices of the chinese communists? I'd say that was a GOOD thing and something to be promoted in this country.
Thirty-Two Workers Die in Chinese Molten Steel Spill An industrial ladle holding 30 metric tons of molten steel sheared off an iron rail while moving into the pouring position at the plant. The over 2,700 degree Fahrenheit molten steel immediately flowed into a room less than 5 meters away. All 32 workers inside the room, who were waiting to change shifts, were burned to death.
7
posted on
05/01/2007 8:07:49 AM PDT
by
hedgetrimmer
(I'm a billionaire! Thanks WTO and the "free trade" system!--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
To: JohnnyZ
Does this mean JapanAir can finally take over some US airlines and make them not royally suck?Maybe we'll finally get back to flight attendents that are attractive and young females.
8
posted on
05/01/2007 8:13:27 AM PDT
by
Clock King
(Bring the noise!)
To: Clock King
That would be a bonus. American flight attendents are some of the ugliest on the planet.
9
posted on
05/01/2007 8:14:42 AM PDT
by
1rudeboy
To: hedgetrimmer
What I read was many years ago, the complaint was that the mills here were not being modernized whereas the Japanese had far outstripped them.
One can always find poor practices elsewhere in the world, but that's insufficient without a clear indication that it is exectly those industries that are undermining US production. I haven't seen that connection with steel yet, but I will grant you that for the Christmas-tree light industry.
10
posted on
05/01/2007 8:20:56 AM PDT
by
sionnsar
(trad-anglican.faithweb.com |Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
To: 1rudeboy
You really do dislike America. I’ve never seen you post anything nice about Americans.
11
posted on
05/01/2007 8:29:59 AM PDT
by
hedgetrimmer
(I'm a billionaire! Thanks WTO and the "free trade" system!--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
To: sionnsar
If the government is actively working to give the competitive advantage to foreign producers, you’re pretty much sunk. That is the problem with “free trade”. It is giving the first world economy over to China India and Mexico, because the “free traitors” are slavering over the captive markets of billions of people in those countries.
There is nothing free about “free trade”. It was denounced by our Founders, and it is enormously harmful to the independence they fought and died for.
12
posted on
05/01/2007 8:33:13 AM PDT
by
hedgetrimmer
(I'm a billionaire! Thanks WTO and the "free trade" system!--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
To: hedgetrimmer
13
posted on
05/01/2007 8:34:38 AM PDT
by
1rudeboy
To: hedgetrimmer; A. Pole; Willie Green
a.pole and Willie Green memorial ping.
14
posted on
05/01/2007 8:36:48 AM PDT
by
Incorrigible
(If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
To: 1rudeboy
Really?
American flight attendents are some of the ugliest on the planet.
--1rudeboy
15
posted on
05/01/2007 8:38:30 AM PDT
by
hedgetrimmer
(I'm a billionaire! Thanks WTO and the "free trade" system!--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
To: hedgetrimmer
16
posted on
05/01/2007 8:41:40 AM PDT
by
1rudeboy
To: JohnnyZ
My guess is that Aeroflot circa 1970 treated its passengers no worse than United and Northwest 2007.
17
posted on
05/01/2007 8:42:03 AM PDT
by
Lolipop Jones
(Republican Liberty Caucus, Club for Growth member.)
To: JohnnyZ
Does this mean JapanAir can finally take over some US airlines and make them not royally suck?We can only hope.
18
posted on
05/01/2007 8:42:34 AM PDT
by
Just another Joe
(Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
To: hedgetrimmer
Who would have guessed, 30 years ago, that the only good jobs in the airline industy would be with that silly little purple-colored small-package airline, Federal Express?
19
posted on
05/01/2007 8:45:12 AM PDT
by
cookcounty
(No journalist ever won a prize for reporting the facts. --Telling big stories? Now that's a hit.)
To: hedgetrimmer
"An industrial ladle holding 30 metric tons of molten steel sheared off an iron rail while moving into the pouring position at the plant. The over 2,700 degree Fahrenheit molten steel immediately flowed into a room less than 5 meters away. Are you sure? Rosie says steel can't melt.
20
posted on
05/01/2007 8:47:56 AM PDT
by
cookcounty
(No journalist ever won a prize for reporting the facts. --Telling big stories? Now that's a hit.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson