[tcrlaf]

TRANSLATION: "We just don't know how many important DEMOCRATS are on the list, yet!!"

If it has lots of the Washington Democrat Elite, this story gets buried faster than a Clinton Aide in Marcy Park...(IMHO)

[Wings-n-Wind]

C'mon WA_PO....
Where are Woodward & Bernstein when your readers really need them????

No guts.... No Pulitzer...

[Badeye]

“TRANSLATION: “We just don’t know how many important DEMOCRATS are on the list, yet!!” “

Actually, I’d say it tells us they realized it after they released a couple of GOP names, and now are desperately trying to walk backwards.

Its not going to work, eventually the entire list will come out.

[Callahan]

It’s not a story if it’s a Rat. Everybody already assumes they cavort with hookers.

[dead]

I'm all for exposing corrupt politicians, but I can see the need for a little more verification than your name on some whore's rolodex. She could have copied names from the phone book, or sold real estate in her rolodex to anybody with a grudge or an agenda.

If she's got cancelled checks, now we're talking!

[justanotherfreeper]

Washington Editors: Reluctant to Publish 'D.C. Madam' Democrat Client List. There, fixed!

[ConservativeMind]

Yeah, hold off on mentioning the Democrat clients until their useful time in office is over or until this all blows over after tiring the public on the revelations around all the Republican clients.

I hope the liberal media continues to suffer a cruel death.

[rwfromkansas]

Will she release the list? All there seems to be is speculation.

I heard she supposedly released it, but then others say she still hasn’t.

What exactly is the truth?

If she does release it, surely it will hit the net eventually, even if newspapers don’t want to print the names.

[pillut48]

No way! Not with [cue heroic music] BLOGGERS out there!!!
Da da da! :-)

No way this stuff will stay ‘secret’. Not in this day and age.

[advertising guy]

“you have to look at each (name) individually.There is a public figure test”

says it all in the heathens own words.....that is cherry pickin big time

[pissant]

They were happy to leak the poor sap Tobias’ name though.

[alloysteel]

Now if there were a preponderance of REPUBLICANS on the list, the speed at which a (redacted) list would be published would be dizzying.

The redaction, of course, would include every Democratican party member or contributor on the list.

[Red Badger]

...There is a public figure test.

Translation: There is a party affiliation test.

[Izzy Dunne]

We would not just print it, we would look at it. You see who is on it and make some calls.

"Yo, Teddy. I got you on the list - is that true?"

"naw."

"OK, thanks." Spike it!

[mtnwmn]

It’s possible that they won’t release any names until closer to the election. Then they will release the Republicans but not the Democrats. I hope the Internet can get hold of the names so that won’t work against us.

[M203M4]

DC MADAME STORY VERY HARD ON MEDIA EDITORS - MOST WANT HAPPY ENDING.

[bcsco]

TRANSLATION: "We just don't know how many important DEMOCRATS [and well-known members of the media] are on the list, yet!!"

There, fixed it!

[timydnuc]

These are the same people that would publish classified intelligence documents and get our troops killed and they don’t feel comfortable publishing a “diddle” list for a hooker! Excuse me while I go throw up!

[ZULU]

GREAT book potential there and YES - I bet MOST of them are Dems.

Hope she writes one about this.

[ridgerunner]

Maybe it because HRC is among the people listed.

[<1/1,000,000th%]

If the list was written using Word 1973, they’d be all over it.