Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scalia says judges shouldn't change Constitution
First Amendment Center ^ | 05/01/07

Posted on 05/02/2007 1:30:21 PM PDT by presidio9

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 last
To: highball

LOL nobody Creates rights


61 posted on 05/03/2007 5:17:14 AM PDT by expatguy (http://laotze.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: GoLightly
All laws infringe on someone's rights in some way. The Constitution laid out some agreed upon basic rights which we (the government, the people) will work to favor for each other. Freedom of speech versus freedom from hearing "offensive" speech. The Constitution doesn't say our government can't search us or our home, but places rules on what the government needs to do in order to do so.

It's why "Justice" is shown holding a balance, because enforcement of all man made laws involve weighing opposing interests.

What? "Freedom from hearing "offensive" speech"? That doesn't make any sense.

Look, you're making this much more complicated than it really is. Free men have rights. The Constitution was written to show exactly where the government can infringe upon those rights. It is a complete list of governmental powers, not a list of rights. If the government is not given the power in the Constitution to regulate something, then it has no authority to do so.

The Founders wrote it in very clear language, and I'm staggered that Scalia can't or doesn't want to see it.

62 posted on 05/03/2007 6:47:26 AM PDT by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: RKV
Well, that’s where the enumerated (limited) powers part comes in. I certainly don’t see anything about buttered popcorn (or popcorn of any flavor) in the Constitution do you?

You're right, it's not there (praise God!). All I ask is that if a right to buttered popcorn on demand IS ever recognized, it be done so by the People, through their Legislative Branch or by amending the Constitution, and NOT by a bunch of Judges peering ex-post-facto into the penumbra around the edges of the Constitution through horn-rimmed glasses as they sip Kool Aid in their chambers and formulate a final decision in the case of Roe v. Reddenbacher...

63 posted on 05/03/2007 7:17:32 AM PDT by O Neill (Aye, Katie Scarlett, the ONLY thing that lasts is the land...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: TSchmereL
"Why is this even debatable"

Because: "The Constitution is a mere thing of wax in the hands of the judiciary, which they may twist and shape into any form they please." - Thomas Jefferson, 1819
64 posted on 05/14/2007 5:08:57 PM PDT by LuxMaker (The Constitution is a mere thing of wax in the hands of the judiciary, Thomas J 1819)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past

You are so right! Thier like little brats who can’t get thier way so they stomp thier feet, whine and look for other deviate ways to get thier way! SHUT UP AND SIT DOWN OR WE’LL PUT YOU IN THE CORNER!


65 posted on 05/14/2007 5:13:24 PM PDT by ronnie raygun (ID RATHER BE HUNTING WITH DICK THAN DRIVING WITH TED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson