Skip to comments.
Jill Stanek: The Forced Abortion Act
WorldNetDaily ^
| 5/2/07
| Jill Stanek
Posted on 05/02/2007 3:20:23 PM PDT by wagglebee
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
The left is desperate to protect the sacrament of infanticide.
1
posted on
05/02/2007 3:20:25 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
To: cgk; Coleus; cpforlife.org; narses; 8mmMauser
2
posted on
05/02/2007 3:21:08 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: 230FMJ; 49th; 50mm; 69ConvertibleFirebird; Alexander Rubin; An American In Dairyland; Antoninus; ...
3
posted on
05/02/2007 3:21:37 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: wagglebee
Anyone who wonders why folks like me are borderline deranged when it comes to opposing Rudy Giuliani’s presidential aspirations should realize that he’d probably sign this bill into law if he were sitting in the White House right now.
To: wagglebee
I’m not sure how this would work. How can a law be enacted that cannot be struck down by the SCOTUS?
To: wagglebee
.... fearing for their deathlihood..... LOL.
Catchy!
6
posted on
05/02/2007 3:26:14 PM PDT
by
Responsibility2nd
(Warning. If your tagline is funny... I may steal it.)
To: WorkingClassFilth
It has to be in the Constitution or amendment. What they want is basically that, a law with Constitutional authority and since they know the people would never put it into the Constitution this a a special interest end-run at the Constitution.
Won’t work.
7
posted on
05/02/2007 3:32:14 PM PDT
by
edcoil
(Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
To: WorkingClassFilth
It has to be in the Constitution or amendment. What they want is basically that, a law with Constitutional authority and since they know the people would never put it into the Constitution this a a special interest end-run at the Constitution.
Won’t work.
8
posted on
05/02/2007 3:32:26 PM PDT
by
edcoil
(Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
To: Alberta's Child
Rudy doesn’t have a chance. Guy’s a NYC Republican ~ don’t mean a thing.
9
posted on
05/02/2007 3:35:07 PM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: WorkingClassFilth
By not violating the constitution or amendments.
10
posted on
05/02/2007 3:35:10 PM PDT
by
amchugh
(large and largely disgruntled)
To: wagglebee
Pro-aborts
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I call them the Death Eaters.
11
posted on
05/02/2007 3:36:01 PM PDT
by
wintertime
(Good ideas win! Why? Because people are not stupid!)
To: Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Fedora; Fred Nerks; KlueLass; Seadog Bytes; ...
12
posted on
05/02/2007 3:37:33 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(I last updated my profile on Saturday, April 28, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: amchugh
Yeah...but Roe V. Wade is already supposed to be Constitutional (cough, cough) and, yet, this Court may still overturn it. Seems to me that there is no such thing as a law that cannot be overturned no matter how it is crafted.
To: WorkingClassFilth
Rove v wade said there in nothing in the Constitution that said the law was limited to health of mother and baby in Texas for an abortion. It specifically noted it did not authorized unlimited abortion. Read it.
14
posted on
05/02/2007 3:47:01 PM PDT
by
edcoil
(Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
To: Coleus; nickcarraway; narses; Mr. Silverback; Canticle_of_Deborah; TenthAmendmentChampion; ...
Please Freepmail me if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.
15
posted on
05/02/2007 3:58:07 PM PDT
by
cpforlife.org
(A Catholic Respect Life Curriculum is available at KnightsForLife.org)
To: wagglebee; MHGinTN; Mr. Silverback; All
WOW!
April 27 something powerful in the spiritual realm (from the devil) was going on in PP in SD. I was there prayer sieging and ended up there for most of the day. From the spiritual realm there was battle that rendered me with no strength, and physically shaking. In the physical realm there was a camera crew that showed up, high dollar vehicles from several states bearing briefcase toting business attired women. What does Illinois have to do the South Dakota PP?
Any idea when this FOCA was brought back up?
I am wondering what was video-taped. The van had no logo on it defining who they were.
They were aborting that day along with whatever this meeting was about.
16
posted on
05/02/2007 4:12:07 PM PDT
by
MountainFlower
(There but by the grace of God go I.)
To: wintertime
Pro-aborts
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ I call them the Death Eaters.
My word, I think you have something with that.
The way they carry on about the least little bit of restriction on infanticide one might think we had cut off their food supply.
17
posted on
05/02/2007 4:43:11 PM PDT
by
LibKill
("RUDY GIULIANI" is just "HILLARY CLINTON" misspelled and wearing a dress.)
To: wagglebee
Yep. FOCA is really special interest legislation on behalf of a very unpopular industry - the abortion industry. It has nothing to do with protecting women's rights, whatever the femi-nazis would like to have the public believe.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
18
posted on
05/02/2007 5:04:19 PM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: MountainFlower
It is about having the rites of alive unborn child slaughter institutionalized as a sacred rite ... it is vital to continue unceasingly opposing this evil, regardless of how many times the servants of hell succeed in their service to the hellish rites. Know this, the evil will not cease until Christ returns ... we are called to strive against the evil and in the process some will be drawn to the Lord's Grace. He will have the victory but we are instructed to strive and continue striving even unto the end of the age.
One of the things we ought do more effectively is expose the treachery of men like Harry Reid, who voted for a ban on partial birth abortion but showed his true dead soul by griping when the subpreme court didn't toss out the ban! Most democrats will make excuses for Harry, but some, maybe even a small number, will see the duplicitous nature of the Harry Reids running the democrat party. It is the only way to get these dead souls out of office.
19
posted on
05/02/2007 5:57:16 PM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(You've had life support. Promote life support for others.)
To: wagglebee
“...to infinity and beyond ...”
LOL, what?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson