Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

World Bank offers to fund Iran-Pakistan-India gas pipeline project
domain-b.com ^ | 2 May 2007

Posted on 05/02/2007 10:15:51 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe

Mumbai: The World Bank has expressed its readiness to fund the Iran-Pakistan-India gas pipeline and described the $7 billion project as a `win-win deal' despite US reservations about the project.

World Bank vice president Praful Patel said although the bank has not been approached by Pakistan to this effect formally or informally, the bank was ready to fund as and when approached.

"IPI gas pipeline project is a win-win project for Pakistan and India besides being good and quite feasible in catering to the energy needs of Pakistan and India," he said.

If the IPI project materialises, Pakistan would get an annual transit fee from India, which would play a pivotal role in strengthening its economy, Patel said.

He said the bank also supports the Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan (TAP) gas pipeline project. "If Pakistan would come to ask for funding for any of the pipelines, the World Bank would seriously consider extending the funding," he said.

The bank would give a serious consideration to finance these projects if approached, he said.

An Iranian oil official, meanwhile, suggested that Iran would welcome any involvement by the Russian oil giant Gazprom in the project, adding it would speed progress.

Gholam-Hossein Nozari, managing director of the National Iranian Oil Company, did not say whether Iran had been in contact with Gazprom on the issue and failed to provide details on what kind of participation he had in mind.

"Gazprom is a capable and big company and if it enters the peace pipeline, it will help with the progress and speed up the operation," Iranian news agency ISNA quoted him as saying.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: energy; gasputin; india; iran; naturalgas; pakistan

1 posted on 05/02/2007 10:15:54 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Nothing like the World Bank ensuring taht Iran can bribe Russia, Pakistan, and India into inaction as the Ayatollahs go nuclear.

Damn Tranzi bastards.

2 posted on 05/02/2007 10:30:23 PM PDT by rmlew (It's WW4 and the Left wants to negotiate with Islamists who want to kill us , for their mutual ends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe; rmlew

Iran signs gas deal with Austria’s OMV [30-Billion-Dollar Deal]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1821539/posts
Iran signs gas deal with Austria’s OMV

The Peninsula/Reuters | Apr. 22, 2006

TEHRAN • Iran signed a major agreement with Austrian energy group OMV yesterday to help develop the country’s vast gas resources and build a plant for liquefied natural gas (LNG), official Iranian media said.

State television described it as Iran’s biggest such contract with Europe, and some Iranian media put its total value at up to $30 billion over 25 years, including the sale of billions of cubic metres of natural gas to the continent.

But OMV made clear the deal was still at an early stage and did not give any figures, suggesting it had so far only signed a non-binding memorandum of understanding.

It comes at a time of escalating tension between the West and Iran over Tehran’s disputed nuclear programme. The United States, which accuses Iran of seeking to build atom bombs, has urged its allies not to invest in the Islamic Republic.

Iran sits atop the world’s second-largest gas reserves after Russia. But politics, sanctions and construction delays have slowed its gas development and analysts say it is unlikely to become a major exporter for a decade.

The huge oil and gas reserves are a strong magnet for international energy companies despite the political risks.

“Officials of Iran’s Oil Ministry and the managing director of the Austrian OMV have signed a gas agreement worth $18bn,” Iranian state radio said. The Oil Ministry’s Shana news agency estimated the long term value at $30bn.

OMV said it had signed a so-called Heads of Agreement – a non-binding document outlining the main issues of a tentative partnership accord-with Iran’s national oil company NIOC.

It concerned participation in the development of an area of the South Pars gas field, an LNG plant and a subscriber agreement for such gas, it said. LNG is gas frozen to liquid for transport in special tankers, avoiding the need for pipelines.

TALKS CONFIDENTIAL

The Austrian firm said Iran could supply LNG for a Croatian regasification plant which OMV is helping to set up and which should start operating in 2011-2012.

It added: “Further talks on this matter are confidential. Concrete results are not expected until the second half of 2007.”

UN sanctions have been imposed on Iran for its refusal to halt enrichment of uranium, but OMV spokesman Thomas Huemer said the agreement with Iran did not violate any international rules.

“We are acting within the framework of Austrian law, European law and the United Nations’ rules,” he said in Vienna.

Iran says its atom work is aimed at generating electricity so that it can export more of its valuable gas and oil.


3 posted on 05/02/2007 10:50:55 PM PDT by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick
Austria is one of the few members of the EU which is not also a member of NATO, and they are helping the Russia-Iran "gas opec" coil its tentacles around Europe.

Gazprom to open underground gas storage in Austria - Russian energy giant Gazporm, Germany's RAJ AJ and Russian-German Wingas are planning to open an underground gas storage facility in Haidach, Austria. Sergei Khan, head of Gazprom's underground gas storage department, told a forum on Russia's fuel and energy sector in St. Petersburg Wednesday that each of the partners would have a 33% share in the new facility. Khan said: "We have [signed] gas storage contracts with a number of countries, including Germany, Austria and England, and we are now taking up ownership." Gazprom also plans to build an underground gas storage facility with a capacity of 0.5 billion cubic meters of gas in Belgium, and is considering launching underground gas storage projects in China, Pakistan, India, Iran, Romania and Italy.

Khan said that ten independent companies had spun off from Gazprom's regional subsidiaries, which handle gas transportation. "By late this year Gazprom-PHG will take over these independent companies, and a unified body will be established," Khan said.

4 posted on 05/02/2007 10:59:45 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Not to be cynical, but the last time I remember an Austrian working with an Ayranian and radical Islamists, to control oil and people were talking about killing Jews, they serious.


5 posted on 05/02/2007 11:45:44 PM PDT by rmlew (It's WW4 and the Left wants to negotiate with Islamists who want to kill us , for their mutual ends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Well Austria is doing it at the behest of the rest of Nato/Europe. Do you think that the deal is for Austrian demand alone?


6 posted on 05/03/2007 1:05:35 AM PDT by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick
Western Europe are a bunch of commies and dhimmies who want Russia and Iran to rule over them because they hate themselves. Eastern Europe are America's closest allies and they don't want this at all because they remember what it was like to be ruled by Moscow.

Do you hate yourself and your own country? Do you want to be dependent on Pakistan for energy and pay tribute yearly to their army?

7 posted on 05/03/2007 11:37:52 AM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

No, I don’t. But with America stalling the nuclear fuel deal, and the NPT preventing India from importing from Australia and other places, all the while having China endure NO restrictions(even whilst nuke-arming thugs like Pakistan, NK and Iran itself), is hurting the Indian economy worse than what a pipeline through Pakiland would do, for the near-mid term. I would absolutely hate to see India pay the Pakis money for the transit, but tell me about the other alternatives...


8 posted on 05/03/2007 11:43:36 AM PDT by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick

Keep blaming America for all your problems. That way you’ll never have to face up to your mistakes.


9 posted on 05/03/2007 11:45:47 AM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Very smart. So ahead with the pipeline then? Wait, what was that? America will then blame India for aiding Iran, instead of fixing the problem herself? Noooo!

Idiot.


10 posted on 05/03/2007 11:47:21 AM PDT by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick
Go right ahead. It will be India that you will hear complaining about it afterward, not the USA. Even after we liberate Persia, you will still have to be dependent on Pakistan. Good luck.
11 posted on 05/03/2007 11:57:36 AM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Why isn’t the US liberating Persia yet???No wait,they are planning to talk-gees just like those cowardly Indians kissing up to the Burmese generals.


12 posted on 05/03/2007 8:54:09 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Are you saying America is cowardly?


13 posted on 05/03/2007 9:05:29 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Iv’e seen you baiting folks on here for a longtime-don’t try it on me.


14 posted on 05/03/2007 9:23:00 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

How come India doesn’t liberate Pakistan? Too busy cutting deals with them and deciding how much India will pay them to deliver Iranian gas?


15 posted on 05/03/2007 9:30:37 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

More or less the same way,the US needs Iran to stabilise Iraq so that the Iraqi oil starts flowing.


16 posted on 05/03/2007 9:32:24 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Like we needed Saddam to stabilize Iraq?


17 posted on 05/03/2007 9:38:48 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

When you can’t offer logical arguments-rely on baiting.How pathetic


18 posted on 05/03/2007 9:40:07 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Well, India was against our liberation of Iraq, just like they are against any attack on Iran. You disagree with India, then?


19 posted on 05/03/2007 9:42:15 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson