At the start of the day, please explain the differences between Rudy Giuliani and Hillary Clinton in the following areas:
The first amendment, McCain-Feingold, thought crimes
The second amendment, gun control
The unalienable right to life, abortion, partial birth abortion, federal funding for abortion
The gay agenda, family, marriage, thought crimes
Illegal aliens, sanctuary cities, amnesty, the rule of law
Respect for the constitution
And follow that up with a discussion on which liberal candidate Rudy or Hillary would be more likely as president with a liberally controlled House and Senate to do the most damage in the short and long terms to the conservative movement, the right to life movement, the right to keep and bear arms movement, the traditional values movement, our border security movement, etc. Would a Republican and RINO minority fight as hard against a liberal Republican president as they would against a liberal democrat?
Wouldn’t the conservative GOP look pretty much like a joke after having fought so hard against abortion, the gay agenda, gun control, etc. for all these years and decades and now suddenly elect a liberal? Besides the conservative movement being killed off, wouldn’t the GOP have lost ALL of its credibility and wouldn’t it be pretty much dead forever after?
And finally, why does it have to be Rudy vs Hillary at this point in time? Isn't there any possiblity that it could be the Liberal Hillary (or some other liberal moonbat Democrat) against a conservative Republican?
Have you no confidence in your own convictions?
I know you haven't really thought all this through yet, so I'm just asking.
The second amendment, gun control
Rudy supports restrictions that would lead to a slippery slope. Hillary is a downhill skier.
The unalienable right to life, abortion, partial birth abortion, federal funding for abortion
Rudy supports these things, Hillary is one of the few people I wish had been aborted.
The gay agenda, family, marriage, thought crimes
For Hillary it takes a village. For Rudy those villages are Sodom and Gomorrah.
Illegal aliens, sanctuary cities, amnesty, the rule of law
No difference on the first three. Hilary thinks she is the law. On this one, I will give Rudy the benefit of the doubt as a prosecutor.
Respect for the constitution
Other than 2nd Amendment(addressed above), I haven't seen anything truly disturbing about Rudy on this one.
Wouldn't’t the conservative GOP look pretty much like a joke after having fought so hard against abortion, the gay agenda, gun control, etc. for all these years and decades and now suddenly elect a liberal? Besides the conservative movement being killed off, wouldn’t the GOP have lost ALL of its credibility and wouldn’t it be pretty much dead forever after?
I don't care about the GOP, I care about what America is and stands for. Of course they would be a joke, but only to a degree slightly greater than at present.
It might kill the conservative movement, but what doesn't kill it, would make it stronger in the long-run. The movement can rescue America, but only if there is enough left to rescue.
Would a Republican and RINO minority fight as hard against a liberal Republican president as they would against a liberal democrat?
Jim, this is the fundamental question. It would not be so scary to sacrifice 4 years for principles if we were talking about another Jimmy Carter. Economic damage can be repaired and as much of a loser as he was/is, I don't actually think he was EVIL, just a fool. But with the WOT and Hillary at the helm well . . . .
At the end of the day, the main goal is to get an acceptable, electable Republican on the ticket. Rudy is certainly not my candidate in the Primary.