To: Liz
It would be OK to repeal it," Rudy said, then quickly added, "It would be OK also if a strict constructionist viewed it as precedent"He was for overturning it before he was against it.
By a matter of seconds.
2 posted on
05/04/2007 4:08:25 AM PDT by
dirtboy
(JimRob's 12th Commandment: Thou shall not trash actual pubbies on FR to pimp false pubbies)
To: dirtboy
Rudy was for overturning Roe it before he was against it. By a matter of seconds.
"I knew that."
6 posted on
05/04/2007 4:17:26 AM PDT by
Liz
(Hunter: For some candidates, a conservative constituency is an inconvenience. For me, it is my hope.)
To: dirtboy
“He was for overturning it before he was against it.
By a matter of seconds.”
LOL
Typical freakin liberal
32 posted on
05/04/2007 5:19:51 AM PDT by
Leatherneck_MT
(Our Forefathers roared for Liberty, their children now whine for security and safety.)
To: dirtboy; Jim Robinson
It would be OK to repeal it," Rudy said, then quickly added, "It would be OK also if a strict constructionist viewed it as precedent" And there you have it. Rudy's idea of a "constructionist" is one who values precedent over original intent.
His problem is that "constructionism" MEANS according to original intent in how the law was constructed. Rudy has twisted it into its opposite in order to preserve and build upon the historic and constitutionally unsupportable gains of the left via the courts.
Anybody dumb enough to have believed this weasely thug should have their noses rubbed in this quote good and hard. It's a priceless mistake.
80 posted on
05/04/2007 7:35:11 AM PDT by
Carry_Okie
(Duncan Hunter for President)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson