[Rameumptom]

Romney stomps in the drudge poll with 89,074 votes

[DBrow]

Umm, Romney got 18% to Tancredo’s 30 something.

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

Bit of a formatting problem there, eh?

[aft_lizard]

Ummmm, according to the results you posted he is the one who got stomped by Tancredo and below Huckabee.

[Vision]

Chrisy ignored Hunter more than any other candidate. I'd love to see a breakdown of the number of questions asked to each and their total response time.

[traderrob6]

Huh? 36% 32,152 Tancredo

[rhombus]

Here we go again. Folks, check the Drudge page for the actual tallies.

[Rameumptom]

{{{{DRUDGE POLL}}}} WHO WON THE REAGAN DERBY?

Brownback 2% 1,993

Gilmore 1% 1,331

Giuliani 20% 17,809

Huckabee 4% 3,220

Hunter 3% 2,470

McCain 6% 5,211

Paul 18% 15,926

Romney 36% 32,152

Tancredo 5% 4,376

Tommy Thompson 5% 4,586

Total Votes: 89,074

[Vision]

Brownback’s total is under Gilmore.

Repost totals.

[wagglebee]

See if this looks better (and more accurate):

Brownback: 2% (2,011)

Gilmore: 1% (1,343)

Giuliani: 20% (17,977)

Huckabee: 4% (3,243)

Hunter: 3% (2,487)

McCain: 6% (5,252)

Paul: 18% (16,087)

Romney: 36% (32,510)

Tancredo: 5% (4,411)

Tommy Thompson: 5% (4,623)

Total Votes: 89,944

[SittinYonder]

Tom Tancredo

Mike Huckabee

Jim Gilmore

(in that order)

are the best conservative candidates in the race, IMO. Tancredo has been pegged (largely by his own actions) as a single-issue candidate, but you look at his voting history and you find an excellent record on all the conservative issues.

I realize probably none of these three stand a chance, but we don’t need new candidates to support conservative causes - we’ve got three excellent, well-spoken candidates who are solid on the issues and could beat any one of the sniveling dems.

What we need is to support the conservatives in the race.

[Utah Binger]

Mormon Math?

[redgirlinabluestate]

Noonan, Pundits: Romney Won Debate
Political pundits have been weighing in on Thursday night’s Republican debate, and there appears to be heavy sentiment favoring Mitt Romney’s performance.

But former Massachusetts Gov. Romney "had a certain good-natured command, a presidential voice, and a surprising wiliness. He seemed happy to be there, and in the mysterious way that some people seem to dominate, he dominated.” www.newsmax.com

He did appear comfortable, confident and committed to conservatism.

[billhilly]

This is the second posting of this information that completely gets it wrong. The percentages shown should start with Brown back, not Gilmore. Sonsequently, Ron Paul is getting Romney’s percentage.

Try this:

Brownback
2% 2,145
Gilmore
1% 1,432
Giuliani
20% 19,046
Huckabee
4% 3,432
Hunter
3% 2,611
McCain
6% 5,521
Paul
18% 17,113
Romney
36% 34,749
Tancredo
5% 4,662
Tommy Thompson
5% 4,794

Total Votes: 95,505

[DBrow]

Part of a word freq analysis I ran on the transcript.  This will give you a rough idea of how the breakdown was for overall attention to individual candidates (assuming that the questioner says the candidate's name and the transcript then has the name in a response- it's rough but one easy way to break it down):<P>

 

Word	Frequency	%
Brownback	32	0.14
Bush	8	0.04
Bush's	1	0.00
Catholic	3	0.01
Chris	22	0.10
Clinton	13	0.06
Clintons	1	0.00
Clinton's	1	0.00
cloning	5	0.02
Democrat	3	0.01
democratic	3	0.01
Democrats	10	0.04
Gilmore	33	0.14
Giuliani	48	0.21
Hillary	6	0.03
HillaryCare	1	0.00
Huckabee	31	0.14
Hunter	21	0.09
Matthews	190	0.83
McCain	49	0.22
McCain-Feingold	1	0.00
me	33	0.14
Paul	29	0.13
Romney	50	0.22
Ron	1	0.00
Ronald	21	0.09
Tancredo	42	0.18
Thompson	27	0.12
Thompson's	1	0.00
Vandehei	38	0.17
VanderHei	2	0.01
VendeHei	1	0.00
Zogby	1	0.00

 

 

Different words/items counted: 2633

Total Words: 19018

Total Punctuation: 3457

Total Other Text: 99

Total Characters: 106001

Total Paragraphs: 1322