Somehow in your self-importance, you may want to consider that your little recitation of personal disagreements about others demeanor simply just does not rise to the importance to justify bothering the flow of intelligent discourse.
I tweaked the author for using the subject in question to unfairly misrepresent an entire political way of thought by the use of moral equivalence...a decidedly cowardly and dishonest trick. He resorts to this tactic altogether too often.
Hey Bart, I have no idea what you’re talking about.
What is the “preposterous scenario” that “ain’t gonna happen”?
What “political way of thought”?
And JohnHuang is the poster, not the author.
To be truthful, I hadn't noticed any.