Both Washington and Jefferson said words to that effect...
First Washington
http://www.answers.com/topic/george-washington-s-farewell-address
“the baneful effects of the spirit of party” should be muted because they threatened liberty by subordinating people to demagogic leaders and hampering the ability of the President to promote the national interest. Third, U.S. diplomacy should “steer clear of permanent alliances” and “trust to temporary alliances for extraordinary emergencies.”
and Jefferson:
http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/presiden/inaug/jefinau1.htm
About to enter, fellow-citizens, on the exercise of duties which comprehend everything dear and valuable to you, it is proper you should understand what I deem the essential principles of our Government, and consequently those which ought to shape its Administration. I will compress them within the narrowest compass they will bear, stating the general principle, but not all its limitations. Equal and exact justice to all men, of whatever state or persuasion, religious or political; peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with none; the support of the State governments in all their rights, as the most competent administrations for our domestic concerns and the surest bulwarks against antirepublican tendencies; the preservation of the General Government in its whole constitutional vigor, as the sheet anchor of our peace at home and safety abroad; a jealous care of the right of election by the people — a mild and safe corrective of abuses which are lopped by the sword of revolution where peaceable remedies are unprovided; absolute acquiescence in the decisions of the majority, the vital principle of republics, from which is no appeal but to force, the vital principle and immediate parent of despotism; a well-disciplined militia, our best reliance in peace and for the first moments of war till regulars may relieve them; the supremacy of the civil over the military authority; economy in the public expense, that labor may be lightly burthened; the honest payment of our debts and sacred preservation of the public faith; encouragement of agriculture, and of commerce as its handmaid; the diffusion of information and arraignment of all abuses at the bar of the public reason; freedom of religion; freedom of the press, and freedom of person under the protection of the habeas corpus, and trial by juries impartially selected. These principles form the bright constellation which has gone before us and guided our steps through an age of revolution and reformation. The wisdom of our sages and blood of our heroes have been devoted to their attainment. They should be the creed of our political faith, the text of civic instruction, the touchstone by which to try the services of those we trust; and should we wander from them in moments of error or of alarm, let us hasten to retrace our steps and to regain the road which alone leads to peace, liberty, and safety.
Thank you all.
Only on FreeRepublic could I post a Vanity and get such an educated response within such a short period of time.
Carry on everyone, carry on :)
Something to the effect of its better to suffer under a tyrant than people with good intentions because a tyrant might become tired, but people with ood intentions think they are helping you.
This is, by the way, the same Jefferson who sought an “entangling alliance” with the Holy Roman Empire, France, Britain, and whoever else would join in our first “War on Terror” against the Barbary Pirates. When no one else would help (sound familiar?) TJ used a Joint Resolution to literally “declare war” on the Bey of Tripoli, and ALL other terrorist nations in the region, until they all submitted. TJ had no problem, either, with an “entangling alliance” with FRANCE-—only one with England.