Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Arms race' leaving Australian submarines all at sea
The Age,Australia ^ | May 6, 2007 | Tom Hyland

Posted on 05/06/2007 5:16:35 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Collins class boat

1 posted on 05/06/2007 5:16:36 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Out of curiosity, how do the Aussie boats compare capability wise to Seawolf and Virginia class subs?
2 posted on 05/06/2007 5:25:03 AM PDT by Zakeet (Be thankful we don't get all the government we pay for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Submarines at sea?

Where will it all end? With airplanes aloft? Soldiers in uniform? Democrats in prison?

Some things just seem so natural.


3 posted on 05/06/2007 5:26:16 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets ("We will have peace with the Arabs when they love their children more than they hate us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

When down under, do submarines surface to dive and dive to surface?


4 posted on 05/06/2007 5:31:20 AM PDT by Jeff Gordon (History convinces me that bad government results from too much government. - Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

Read the story. The Australian Navy is finding that they’re losing sub crews because of the amount of at sea time. Lose too many crew members and suddenly submarines aren’t at sea any more.


5 posted on 05/06/2007 5:31:39 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

The Collins are D/E subs,while the 2 US subs are Nuclear boats.The N-boats carry far more weaponry,can stay underwater for months & can sustain speeds of 30+ knots.The Collins,are probably quieter underwater when running on their batteries,but they can do so only for upto 2 or 3 days before needing to surface & also at very low speeds(5 knots or so).


6 posted on 05/06/2007 5:32:08 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Ping.


7 posted on 05/06/2007 5:34:09 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Guns themselves are fairly robust; their chief enemies are rust and politicians) (NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
Judging by unclassified reports, the Collins class is like a Kia, compared to a Hummer.
8 posted on 05/06/2007 5:35:50 AM PDT by Paperpusher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Sorry, the headline fake me out.

It is my underingstanding that U.S. Submarines have two crews, since the ships are more tolerant of long deployments than sailors. Thunder boomers are almost continuously at sea, something like 90% availability. The sailors spend 55% of their time on shore-duty lite, (some training, maintenance and a lot of liberty) which makes submarining an attractive career path for people who are good at delayed gratification and can amuse themselves without getting into trouble.


9 posted on 05/06/2007 6:20:23 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets ("We will have peace with the Arabs when they love their children more than they hate us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Image hosted by Photobucket.com sounds like it's gettin kinda crowed around there...
10 posted on 05/06/2007 6:28:24 AM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
It is my underingstanding that U.S. Submarines have two crews, since the ships are more tolerant of long deployments than sailors.

Boomers yes, but not fast attacks. The divorce rate among their crews is very high.

11 posted on 05/06/2007 7:16:05 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

IIRC, there used to be a wealth of submarine knowledge on FR. I wonder what happened?


12 posted on 05/06/2007 7:24:07 AM PDT by Rb ver. 2.0
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Chode
"sounds like it's gettin kinda crowed around there...

LOL ... someday, if all nations keep building 'em at the same rate and we could get 'em all to surface at the same time, we could just walk across the oceans.
13 posted on 05/06/2007 7:24:34 AM PDT by SomeSay (I was misquoted!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SomeSay
Image hosted by Photobucket.com heard that...
14 posted on 05/06/2007 7:42:51 AM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I suspect that in the future, because of the proliferation of submarines, more efforts will be made on early detection and tracking.

The first of these, SOSUS, a Cold War relic, was instrumental in helping us detect new and quieter Soviet subs. And now, with the advent of very quiet diesel subs, we may need to do SOSUS one better.

In addition, there may be a need for other underwater assets, that could be unmanned and just sit on the bottom until needed. When given a signal, they release their ballast and float to the surface for whatever purpose.


15 posted on 05/06/2007 7:49:34 AM PDT by Popocatapetl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

btt


16 posted on 05/06/2007 12:23:41 PM PDT by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

The US resolved that with two crews for most of it’s submarines. That way you get 6 months of training and at home time. Most US Merchant Marine sailors also have an enforced 6 months off a year too.

A few of the West Pack Widows were reputed to have had a hot bunk /”Paint Your Wagon” status with members of different crews of the same ship.

I withhold judgement on the practice. Mark Twain’s “Letters from the Earth” suggests that arrangement wouldn’t be much of a problem in a rational world, but Twain was a humorist.


17 posted on 05/06/2007 2:08:56 PM PDT by donmeaker (You may not be interested in War but War is interested in you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Popocatapetl

Been operational over 20 years, it’s called SURTASS.


18 posted on 05/06/2007 2:10:02 PM PDT by Shellback Chuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

That potential was exposed last October, when a Chinese attack submarine shadowed, undetected, the US aircraft carrier Kitty Hawk in the East China Sea near Okinawa. The Chinese sub then effectively declared “Gotcha!” by surfacing eight kilometres from the carrier. For a modern submarine, eight kilometres is as good as point blank range.

I don’t suppose we will ever know the whole truth, but during some prior post it was suggested it surfaced because it WAS detected.


19 posted on 05/06/2007 2:18:19 PM PDT by PeterPrinciple ( Seeking the truth here folks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeterPrinciple

If it sufaced after it was detected, question is did it surface directly after being detected ?

If so, then it still got to within 8km of a carrier, far too close for comfort.


20 posted on 05/06/2007 2:40:45 PM PDT by Axlrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson