Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gondramB

No, the proposed law requires causing physical injury.


So, if I yell a humiliating remark about someone I’m beating, that’s worse than a cold unemotional attack for no reason on that same person? Sorry, that doesn’t make sense.
So, it’s okay to humiliate, just not in a fight?


18 posted on 05/06/2007 7:18:21 PM PDT by Joan Kerrey (Believe nothing of what you hear or read and half of what you see.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Joan Kerrey

>>So, if I yell a humiliating remark about someone I’m beating, that’s worse than a cold unemotional attack for no reason on that same person? Sorry, that doesn’t make sense.
So, it’s okay to humiliate, just not in a fight? <<

It does seem crazy doesn’t it.

The only possible justification I can see comes from the history near Atlanta.

There is a county just north of Atlanta that had a sign at border “Nigger, don’t let the sun go down on you in Forsyth county.”

I can see an argument that if the first black person who tried to spend the night in Forsyth county was attacked it would be a form of terrorism, not just an attack on an individual but an attempt to inspire terror in a larger population.

But the risk of misuse of these laws is very, very, high.


21 posted on 05/07/2007 8:40:09 AM PDT by gondramB (God only has ten rules, uncle Hank, and he has a much bigger house.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson