Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GovernmentShrinker

I agree with the intent of Life-site, as I am very pro-life. I have found that LSN is often deceptive and sometimes blatently dishonest in their articles. I don’t know why as I have always found the lives of the unborn to be a very persuasive goal, no matter what the other side says.

I believe that if you must be dishonest to sway people to your way of thinking, you do more harm than good to your cause. LSN never provides the other side of the story, only their side. This indicates to me that they are not confident enough in their beliefs to be honest about their cause, and yes, I think this does harm to their cause. I no longer use them as a source of information.


5 posted on 05/06/2007 3:24:32 PM PDT by ga medic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: ga medic

Why would you think that Life Site would be deliberately dishonest?

I don’t see what they would have to gain.


8 posted on 05/06/2007 5:29:40 PM PDT by Sun (Vote for Duncan Hunter in the primaries. See you there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson