Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: John W
"What would have been the basis for this “huge lawsuit”?"

I don't know, you would have to ask the attorney. If the client's name and number appeared in the DC Madame's phone records, it doesn't prove anything other than a phone call occurred. If it was innocent or lawful, I would think that ABC may be risking a defamation or libel suit.

33 posted on 05/06/2007 4:34:23 PM PDT by TommyDale ("Can debate over four hours with no need to call a doctor!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: TommyDale
I don't know, you would have to ask the attorney. If the client's name and number appeared in the DC Madame's phone records, it doesn't prove anything other than a phone call occurred. If it was innocent or lawful, I would think that ABC may be risking a defamation or libel suit.

Only if ABC reported that the names on the list had done something untoward. If they were to simply report the names on the list (as gathered through the FOIA), no harm no foul. I would tend to believe (at this point) that the decision was due to the lack of players on the list.

I assume (yeah, yeah, never assume) anyone here is free to plow through the records and report out; how could ABC or any other venue get exclusivity?

44 posted on 05/06/2007 5:06:11 PM PDT by Mr. Bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson