Skip to comments.
Breaking: Buratha News will publish a document proving al-Zawahiri, Zarqawi links to Saddam
Fallujah Forums ^
Posted on 5/7/2007, 12:30:43 PM by harwood
Jihadis preparing to defend themselves against this "fabrication". 50 volunteers neede to stop the "invasion": http://64.233.179.104/translate_c?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&langpair=ar%7Cen&u=http://208.101.48.176/~alshaf3y/vb/showthread.php%3Ft%3D10412&prev=/language_tools
(Excerpt) Read more at 64.233.179.104 ...
TOPICS: War on Terror
KEYWORDS: terror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
1
posted on
5/7/2007, 12:30:44 PM
by
harwood
To: harwood
2
posted on
5/7/2007, 12:34:46 PM
by
johnny7
("Issue in Doubt." -Col. David Monroe Shoup, USMC 1943)
To: harwood
We need a translater here.
To: harwood
4
posted on
5/7/2007, 12:42:49 PM
by
camle
(keep your mind open and somebody will fill it full of something for you)
To: harwood
And their links to crop circles, too, no doubt.........
5
posted on
5/7/2007, 12:47:22 PM
by
Red Badger
(My gerund got caught in my diphthong, and now I have a dangling participle...............)
To: harwood
"Buratha News will publish a document proving al-Zawahiri, Zarqawi links to Saddam"It wouldn't be surprising....
6
posted on
5/7/2007, 12:49:00 PM
by
cake_crumb
(NO BLOOD FOR CONGRESSIONAL PORK! WAR IS POPULAR ONLY TO TERRORISTS!)
To: cake_crumb
No it wouldn’t. But the jihadis are all in a knot that an Arabic language paper has gotten hold of this proof. They will do everything they can to prevent its publication...Must be good stuff.
7
posted on
5/7/2007, 12:50:54 PM
by
harwood
(Ann Coulter: Future SCOTUS nominee!)
To: harwood
"But the jihadis are all in a knot that an Arabic language paper has gotten hold of this proof. They will do everything they can to prevent its publication...Must be good stuff."Yep, same thing I was thinking. If the jihadis have their panties in a twist about this before it's even published it must be true.
8
posted on
5/7/2007, 12:56:50 PM
by
cake_crumb
(NO BLOOD FOR CONGRESSIONAL PORK! WAR IS POPULAR ONLY TO TERRORISTS!)
To: harwood
It is basically saying that on Wednesday they are going to publish a very important Saddam regime document showing Saddam regime relation with Aymen Al Zawahiri, Al Zarqawi and other Al Qaeda terrorists. The article is saying that the Saddam document also shows that Al Zawahiri was assigned an agent number in Saddam intelligence. Saddam Intelligence Service rarely used the names of their members and agents but they assigned numbers to them.
9
posted on
5/7/2007, 1:13:40 PM
by
jveritas
(Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
To: jveritas
Wow, this could be huge...though we won’t hear about it on the news.
10
posted on
5/7/2007, 1:17:22 PM
by
cake_crumb
(NO BLOOD FOR CONGRESSIONAL PORK! WAR IS POPULAR ONLY TO TERRORISTS!)
To: jveritas
I’d hoped that you’d be on top of this one as soon as I saw the login page.
Bravo Zulu.
11
posted on
5/7/2007, 1:19:06 PM
by
Unrepentant VN Vet
(I'm rapidly running out of reasons to consider a democrat as a citizen of the same country.)
To: cake_crumb
I just sent it to Martha McCallum at FOX. She generally responds to my mail, as does Hannity. If FOX will follow it, we may get some traction.
12
posted on
5/7/2007, 1:19:09 PM
by
harwood
(Ann Coulter: Future SCOTUS nominee!)
To: cake_crumb
Once they publish it on Wednesday I will translate it and post it right here on FR
13
posted on
5/7/2007, 1:28:21 PM
by
jveritas
(Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
To: Unrepentant VN Vet
In fact a freeper sent me an freepmail this morning to let me know about it, I will translate and post it on FR once it is published by Burtha News on Wednesday.
14
posted on
5/7/2007, 1:29:49 PM
by
jveritas
(Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
To: harwood
"I just sent it to Martha McCallum at FOX. She generally responds to my mail, as does Hannity. If FOX will follow it, we may get some traction."True, at least Fox will run with it.
15
posted on
5/7/2007, 1:34:01 PM
by
cake_crumb
(NO BLOOD FOR CONGRESSIONAL PORK! WAR IS POPULAR ONLY TO TERRORISTS!)
To: jveritas
"Once they publish it on Wednesday I will translate it and post it right here on FR"Looking forward to reading it. I can't thank you enough for your dedication and hard work.
16
posted on
5/7/2007, 1:36:09 PM
by
cake_crumb
(NO BLOOD FOR CONGRESSIONAL PORK! WAR IS POPULAR ONLY TO TERRORISTS!)
To: cake_crumb
Anytime :) just doing my little duty.
17
posted on
5/7/2007, 1:43:39 PM
by
jveritas
(Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
To: jveritas
Its a shame the Toronto Star or the Sunday London Times wouldn't publish the actual documents they had found.
To: harwood
It is instructive that the same ones who once said that Saddam and al-Qaida couldn’t possibly collude because Iraq was too SECULAR, now say that democracy cannot work in Iraq because Iraq is too ISLAMIC.
To: wayoverontheright
This “no terrorists/al-Queda in Iraq” dribble amazes me. The middle east was rife with extremists way before 9/11. According to Reid/Peloser et all, Iraq must have been a paradise.
20
posted on
5/7/2007, 2:15:32 PM
by
harwood
(Ann Coulter: Future SCOTUS nominee!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson