Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Engine failure studied in Cameroon crash (114 dead)
AP/Yahoo ^ | 7 May 07 | HEIDI VOGT

Posted on 05/07/2007 12:57:00 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback

Investigators focused Monday on the possibility a Kenya Airways jetliner lost power in both engines during a storm just after takeoff and was trying to glide back to the airport when it plunged into a mangrove swamp 12 miles from the runway.

All 114 people on board were killed in the crash, officials in this West African nation said after picking their way along a muddy path to the site strewn with pieces of metal, bodies and shoes.

After being delayed an hour by storms, the Kenya-bound Boeing 737-800 sent a distress signal shortly after takeoff from Douala early Saturday, then lost contact 11 to 13 minutes later. It took searchers more than 40 hours to find the wreckage, most of it submerged in murky orange-brown water and concealed by a canopy of trees.

"The plane fell head first. Its nose was buried in the mangrove swamp," said Thomas Sobakam, chief of meteorology for the Douala airport. He said the jet disintegrated on impact.


TOPICS: Extended News
KEYWORDS: 737; camerooncrash; kenya
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
Prayers up for the families.
1 posted on 05/07/2007 12:57:07 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

There’s more at the source link...forgot to hit the excerpt button.


2 posted on 05/07/2007 12:58:04 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (A pacifist sees no distinction between the arsonist and the fireman--Freeper ccmay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

“lost power in both engines...”

Sounds like they ran out of fuel to me. Either that or the pilot was Islamic.


3 posted on 05/07/2007 12:58:48 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

This happened after takeoff, not during landing approach. Really, what are the chances of an airliner taking off with so little fuel it doesn’t even make it 100 miles from the airport?


4 posted on 05/07/2007 1:03:53 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (A pacifist sees no distinction between the arsonist and the fireman--Freeper ccmay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
Low fuel or contamination? Dual flameout due to weather?


5 posted on 05/07/2007 1:04:30 PM PDT by GalaxieFiveHundred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GalaxieFiveHundred
I can't see low fuel, not less than 100 miles away from the airport. Contamination...maybe. Flameout...definite possibility.

Man, Kenya airways has some pretty jets.

6 posted on 05/07/2007 1:06:10 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (A pacifist sees no distinction between the arsonist and the fireman--Freeper ccmay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

That is pretty curious, but what are the chances of both engines suffering engine failure at the same time?


7 posted on 05/07/2007 1:07:33 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

This happened in 1977 to a Southern Airway flight from Huntsville, AL to Atlanta. Yes - too much water can flame out jet engines.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Airways_Flight_242


8 posted on 05/07/2007 1:12:30 PM PDT by WayneM (Democrats - The Party of Traitors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

This happened in 1977 to a Southern Airway flight from Huntsville, AL to Atlanta. Yes - too much water can flame out jet engines.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Airways_Flight_242


9 posted on 05/07/2007 1:12:34 PM PDT by WayneM (Democrats - The Party of Traitors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Wrong kind of fuel?

Av gas instead of jet fuel?


10 posted on 05/07/2007 1:12:56 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: WayneM

Maybe it depends on how you define engine failure. Personally, it would not consider that engine failure.


11 posted on 05/07/2007 1:14:06 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
That is pretty curious, but what are the chances of both engines suffering engine failure at the same time?

Infinitesimal. I only remember ever hearing of one double engine failure due to weather in the past 30+ years--that was a Southern DC-9 that flew into a thunderstorm and lost both engines due to massive rain and hail ingestion. They ended up crashing on a highway near Atlanta.

The most likely things I could think of that would cause something like that would be losing both engines to bird strikes if they flew into a flock of birds (that's happened before), or fuel contamination. The chances of two modern jet engines suffering serious mechanical failures at the same time, assuming proper maintenance, are vanishingly small.

}:-)4

12 posted on 05/07/2007 1:14:33 PM PDT by Moose4 ("(Rudy's) the exact same animal as Hillary only he wears a dress." --Jim Robinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Moose4

To me, “engine failure” means that the engine manufacturer is to blame. I don’t see how you can blame the engine manufacturer for a crash caused by a flock of birds or a thunderstorm.


13 posted on 05/07/2007 1:16:15 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
Most likely third world fuel and maintenance practices:


14 posted on 05/07/2007 1:25:09 PM PDT by Dumpster Baby ("Hope somebody finds me before the rats do .....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moose4

“When a fail safe system fails, it fails by failing to fail safely.” John Gall in Systemantics.


15 posted on 05/07/2007 1:26:55 PM PDT by dblshot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: WayneM
Too much water can flame out jet engines.

Rain in the tropics can be incredible. The drops are frequently huge, and they can come down in torrents.

It is unlike anything I have ever seen in the temperate zones.

16 posted on 05/07/2007 1:29:14 PM PDT by Zakeet (Be thankful we don't get all the government we pay for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

what are the chances of both engines suffering engine failure at the same time?

I'll be waiting for the flight recorder analysis, m'self. Per the story they found one of them so far...

17 posted on 05/07/2007 1:30:21 PM PDT by GoldCountryRedneck ("The American Indians found out what happens when you don't control immigration."- unknown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

From what I’ve heard, it’s not all that hard to inadvertantly cause this scenario with the 737. It might have actually been pilot error.


18 posted on 05/07/2007 1:37:38 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

My guess is flameout.


19 posted on 05/07/2007 1:38:24 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: WayneM

This happened in 1977 to a Southern Airway flight from Huntsville, AL to Atlanta. Yes - too much water can flame out jet engines.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Airways_Flight_242


This is a perfect example of disasters having at least 3 unrelated causes. The reference does not present the following:
1) the onboard weather radar on 242 was not working, but this was not identified as a flight critical item, so 242 fwas given permission to fly in spite of the equipment failure.
2) when the aircraft was first purchased, a decision was made to NOT carry batteries that would allow on-board restart of the engines. This required batteries on the ground to start the aircraft, but had the benefit of not carrying the weight of the batteries on every flight, thus reducing fuel costs. Southern Airways relied on the fact that both engines had never gone out on this type aircraft at the same time, so they assumed that if one engine went out, they could cross-strap and restart it from the power generated by the other engine.
3) the air traffic controller in charge was new, and his radar only went out 50 miles - so he was unaware of the Air Force Base about 75 miles out which could have handled a landing.

These decisions, each superficially reasonable, then led to the following sequence of events:

a) Since the pilot did NOT see the severity of the storms in front of him, he went into a thundercell with lots of water. The first engine ingested water and flamed out about 100 miles from the Atlanta airport.
b) The flight engineer attempted to restart the engine from the power of the remaining engine when it too went out. (the flight recorder records his [expletive deleted] when he discovered that the second engine flamed out before the first engine had completed restart). The aircraft then had all of the aerodynamic properties of a rock.
c) The pilot declared an emergency, but since the air traffic controller was new, and his radar did not go out to an airforce base which could have served as a landing strip, he did not give him the lifesaving advice — by the time the supervisor arrived and informed the pilot of the runway, it was too late — the pilot was on his own.
d) It was actually to the pilot’s credit that, when he broke out of the clouds on the way down, he spied a long straight road down the middle of a valley, and he was able to land on it (otherwise, no one would have survived). What he did not see was the convenience store with gas pumps about half way down the road; when the aircraft wing hit it, a fire erupted.

Given the circumstances, it was a miracle that most of the passengers survived. Another casualty was Southern Airways itself.

I would guess that the African aircraft did not carry batteries which would allow a restart as well.


20 posted on 05/07/2007 1:52:45 PM PDT by Mack the knife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson