Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

40 percent of babies watch TV, UW study finds
SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER ^ | Tuesday, May 8, 2007 | PAUL NYHAN

Posted on 05/08/2007 7:47:54 AM PDT by Sopater

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: Sopater

We’re pretty good about not having the tv on when our 12 month old is in the room. Although Mr. elc does like to cuddle up with her every now and then and watch the Simpsons.

But we do purposely put on her Baby Signing Times dvd. It has been amazing. We’ve been working on signs with her ourself, but she’s learning the ones from the dvd much faster. Probably because we don’t sing cute little songs when we sign with her.


21 posted on 05/08/2007 9:05:00 AM PDT by elc (Guns kill people the same way the spoon made Rosie O'Donnell fat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oshkalaboomboom

Perhaps its a little strong to say that the companies “foist” this material on parents. We’re all free to choose. The parents can choose to either watch or not, either buy or not. If they don’t consider themselves to be free and believe that this material is being ‘foisted’ on them, then they deserve our sympathy or perhaps even pity.


22 posted on 05/08/2007 9:11:00 AM PDT by definitelynotaliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle

Sorry, but in that study, they didn’t even study children who watched tv versus those that didn’t. They looked at the autism rates in 2 states - California and Pennslyvania I believe - and compared that to cable subscription rates and precipitation rates in those states.

To me, that just does not demonstrate a causal relationship. There could be any other number of variables coming into play.


23 posted on 05/08/2007 9:12:26 AM PDT by elc (Guns kill people the same way the spoon made Rosie O'Donnell fat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Sopater
That's cool, sounds like an easy way to do record keeping for the HS diploma.

Once we got to 10th grade, we used the dual credit system since we're very close to a couple state U's. But for the high school diploma, we had to jump through hoops. I actually thought we'd have to resort to the GED (since he had earned enough credits for an AA during HS, but couldn't get an AA without a high school diploma...it was like a catch-22.)

It finally turned out to be easier than they had led us to believe. We just had to sign an affadavit, get a letter from the Homeschool Office of our public school system saying we were enrolled as homeschoolers, and then present a transcript. Since most of the classes were taken at the college, the transcript was easy.

But on his college transcripts it says "HS diploma, homeschool"...on yours they'll be an actual school that awarded the HS diploma and I think that can be helpful.

24 posted on 05/08/2007 9:15:05 AM PDT by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: elc

I do agree a lot more study is needed.

But I would add that I live very near a large Amish community. They don’t have TV. I know lots of them. I have never heard of an Amish kid with autism. I am sure there are some but not nearly at the rate as the general population.

Up until a certian age our sensory signals are still developing. Overstimulation could very well cause damage.


25 posted on 05/08/2007 9:17:39 AM PDT by JRochelle (Al Sharpton: Its hard out here for a race pimp.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle

And I’ve heard people make the same argument about the Amish and vaccines.

The Amish are a very homogeneous group (genetically). That plays into the autism factor much more than television or vaccines.

That said, I do agree that sensory skills and brain development under the age of three is crucial. It is why we do try very hard to limit television for our daughter and we choose to delay many of her vaccines. Not because we think they cause autism, but because they can interfere with brain development.


26 posted on 05/08/2007 9:24:13 AM PDT by elc (Guns kill people the same way the spoon made Rosie O'Donnell fat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido

Is that Tom Terrific?


27 posted on 05/08/2007 9:29:25 AM PDT by sportutegrl (Bomb Bomb Bomb Bomb Bomb Iran)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: highball

“My son is fifteen months old, and he’s never watched television. My wife and I read to him, play games with him, and take him outside”

I did that with my children and I always got compliments on how well they played. They didn’t complain about not having anything to do or being bored. They had the imagination to make everything into something fun. They are teenagers now and sometimes drive me nuts with their antics. ;-)


28 posted on 05/08/2007 10:06:02 AM PDT by imskylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: elc
>They looked at the autism rates in 2 states - California and Pennslyvania I believe - and compared that to cable subscription rates and precipitation rates in those states

Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything

29 posted on 05/08/2007 10:06:15 AM PDT by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: sportutegrl

Yep, and Manfred the Wonder Dog.

And Clyde Crashcup and his assistant Leonardo (much better than the Chipmunks that the Crashcup cartoons feel in bewteen).


30 posted on 05/08/2007 10:08:44 AM PDT by Larry Lucido (Duncan Hunter 2008 (or Fred Thompson if he ever makes up his mind))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Oshkalaboomboom; Sopater
I think videos like Baby Einstein are closer to child abuse than child development. Babies learn by touching, feeling, interacting and exploring, not by being little couch potatoes.

I disagree. My 3 year old is past the Baby Einstein stage but he really enjoyed them when he was younger. I don't think it is harmful to expose your kid to a few little puppet shows and some classical music. It's not like he didn't touch, feel interact and explore also.

My son is not a couch potato. He has all the wild energy of a 100% boy. If we had forced him to watch Baby Einstein and never interacted with him ourselves, that would be child abuse. But it was just one additional thing he was exposed to that seemed to be mentally stimulating.

31 posted on 05/08/2007 10:17:11 AM PDT by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: highball
I was really angry to see the Baby Einstein founder as W's guest at the State of the Union - sure seemed like he was validating her crap.

From what I've read the founder of Baby Einstein sold the company to Disney then she started working with the creator of America's Most Wanted on a series of videos aimed at keeping teens safe. It was the teen videos that got her honored by Bush, not the baby ones.

32 posted on 05/09/2007 4:31:12 AM PDT by Oshkalaboomboom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Oshkalaboomboom

In that case, I will gladly stand corrected.


33 posted on 05/09/2007 6:43:33 AM PDT by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson