[psychoknk]

Rights do not need to be defined. They either exist or they do not.

So how do I determine if a right exists or doesn't? What is the litmus test? You can't say, "You just know." That won't fly in court.

[JamesP81]

So how do I determine if a right exists or doesn't? What is the litmus test? You can't say, "You just know." That won't fly in court

Neither does this apparent claim in your argument that what rights we have are defined by the government. After all, you did claim there would be additional rights we normally wouldn't have if there was anarchy.

[CharacterCounts]

So how do I determine if a right exists or doesn't? What is the litmus test? You can't say, "You just know." That won't fly in court.

Yes you can. The simple rule is: your rights stop at the other persons nose. In other words the minute the expression of your rights damages or interferes with the rights of another, your rights stop.

[TheKidster]

So how do I determine if a right exists or doesn’t?

Very simple - if what you are doing does not infringe upon the right to life, liberty, or property of another individual. GOD made us all free to do anything we want but when our actions deprive another of life, liberty, or thier property then we have govt. to stop us, punish us or give the victim redress to recoup losses.
Only someone who fears freedom, distrusts liberty, and does not recognize personal accountability believes our rights come from a government created list, and would ask such a silly question.