Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Still Thinking
Ron Paul, the republican that if had his way, Saddam would still be in power to rape and murder the innocent? That Ron Paul? The one that voted against the Iraq war resolution? The one that voted no against it and not present? The Ron Paul that would retreat from Iraq and give them a victory, the same Al Qaeda that attacked us on 9/11 killing 3000 of our citizens? Ron Paul, the republican that voted with a few democrats to not support Israel in its war with Hezzbollah? That Ron Paul?

No thanks. He is not fit to be a dog catcher IMO. My apologies to dog catchers.
14 posted on 05/09/2007 8:10:13 AM PDT by jrooney (The democrats are the friend of our enemy and the enemy of our friends. Attack them, not GW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: jrooney

Well, he’s on the pro-employed-citizen (read anti-government) side of just about every issue. I realize Libertarians aren’t good for everything, but the current crap of Democrats and “republic”ans are all too authoritarian to fulfill the vision of the Founders. How many times has the Bush administration filed amicus briefs upholding the position of an out-of-control government over that of a private citizen? I’m not talking about terrorists here, think Elliot.


16 posted on 05/09/2007 8:30:25 AM PDT by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: jrooney

No, that’s not this Ron Paul. You must be thinking of some other Ron Paul. One that is a figment of your imagination.


17 posted on 05/09/2007 8:33:24 AM PDT by Iwo Jima ("Close the border. Then we'll talk.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: jrooney

Ron Paul who voted against the Iraq Resolution but instead offered a Declaration of War against Iraq to get rid of the dependence of the UN justification for the military action to keep our sovereignty intact and to keep the constitutional power of Congress to declare war in Congress instead of transferring the power to the POTUS. Yep that Ron Paul.


20 posted on 05/09/2007 8:43:11 AM PDT by CJ Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: jrooney

Are there any domestic issues with which you disagreee with Paul on?


32 posted on 05/09/2007 10:22:26 AM PDT by jmc813 (The 2nd Amendment is NOT a "social conservative" issue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: jrooney
Ron Paul, the republican that if had his way, Saddam would still be in power to rape and murder the innocent?

Saddam was keeping down the mullahs and islamofascists who, now in power around the country, have created chaos, established sharia law, and driven 2 million people out of the country - including most Christians.

Saddam was a brutal dictator - but a lot of his brutality was against Islamic nutcases. He was a secularist. That's why Osama hated him.

47 posted on 05/09/2007 1:17:13 PM PDT by freedomdefender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: jrooney
Ron Paul, the republican that if had his way, Saddam would still be in power to rape and murder the innocent?

Nice thread hijack, Bushbot. Nevermind the fact that Paul has praised Bush for vetoing this.

Effing hypocrite...

53 posted on 05/09/2007 1:25:09 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Ben Franklin, we tried but we couldn't keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: jrooney

urp lurp


69 posted on 05/09/2007 1:41:42 PM PDT by DreamsofPolycarp (Ron Paul in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson