Replies

I’ve learned to never take Dick Morris seriously when the topic is the Clinton’s. He’s always wrong on this particular topic, as history shows us.

My second thought is its a mistake to take elections in other countries, one’s with such widely differing sets of circumstances both politically and economically, and apply them to our election cycle two years in the future.

Finally, Ms Royal represented the incumbent’s policies (Chirac) as opposed to Merkle, for example. And the incumbent’s view as we’ve seen repeatedly has been discredited by numerous votes and events - the EU vote a couple of years ago comes to mind, which humiliated Chirac - the incumbent.

I like hearing what Morris has to say on any other topic, but when its the Clinton’s...well, he has Clinton Dysfunction Syndrome in my opinion, and as such is worthless.