“The sum, $150, isn’t exactly a large amount, obviously, but this certainly won’t ease conservative fears that Romney’s pro-life stance isn’t much more than an act of political convenience.”
of course Mitt’s “pro-life” facade is a convenient election conversion. He’s a life-long hunter, don’t cha know?
Mitt’s the Republican Party’s Slick Willie.
How do you know Romney’s pro-choice stance wasn’t a ruse? Did it ever occur to you that Romney doesnt care one way or the other? Just like G Bush Sr, who also switched to conform to the platform. Bush Sr. never did anything pro choice as president, he was true to his word. Why isn’t that a sufficient model for Romney on this issue?