This is the typical output from art eductaion these days, a farce and a waste of time - art now has to be political or it’s not “good”. These kids are being taught and brainwashed that the only application art has is to vent childish emotions, draw attention to oneself, and to propogate political agendas.
There is nothing of merit artistically to be found from painting dead animals - which is disrespectful of not only to the community but the animal itself, better she help dispose of the poor creatures instead of using their dead bodies to be an attention wh*re. She could help spread diseases, perhaps identify dead pets and let the family who misses them know, but nooooo, now she’s a cause celebre, and some family’s missing kitty will now be mocked to boost some teenager’s self esteem. Ghastly, and sincerely creepy. Art? No. It serves no real purpose, and it serves only to push a political agenda, it’s propaganda.
Hundreds of years from now students studying art will see a great void from 1960 on where nothing of merit happened in the arts, just a lot of nonsense and hot air and propoganda that in the perspective of history is clumsy and dull witted.
The “paint” is a toxic waste when left outside a decaying body in the wild: It’s just like spraying paint on a tree or rock. Ugly, and inappropriate.
What would she say if a oil company went into the wilderness and poured 3 gals of oil (paint and paint thinner) on the ground?
Is she sray painting the dead animals? That’s a waste of the can, propellent, energy to make the paint and ship it to the store, and the energy to go back on side roads looking for dead animals to pour paint on.
She's NOT a teenager - she's 24! 24, and still in college. Wonder if there's something wrong with her upstairs.