How deep does the rabbit hole go?
1 posted on
05/11/2007 3:23:55 AM PDT by
don-o
To: Tax-chick; lastchance; Knitting A Conundrum; little jeremiah; maryz; livius; GoLightly; verga
Ping to Mrs Don-o article. Freepmail me to be added or removed.
2 posted on
05/11/2007 3:24:42 AM PDT by
don-o
(We are "THEY")
To: don-o
Hands off live children in your body.
3 posted on
05/11/2007 3:25:48 AM PDT by
bmwcyle
(Pelosi - C an't U nderstand N ormal T hinking)
To: don-o
We don't care about your ovaries.
Don't kill your baby.
Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)
LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)
4 posted on
05/11/2007 3:28:52 AM PDT by
LonePalm
(Commander and Chef)
To: don-o
5 posted on
05/11/2007 3:40:45 AM PDT by
don-o
(We are "THEY")
To: don-o
I’m pretty sure I’ve NEVER touched anyone’s ovaries....nor would I WANT to....!!!
To: don-o
This article smells. Two women in the UK die and we now have a world movement for what? I’m certain I don’t know what the basis for the article is in the first place. A million prebirth babies die every year in the US and there isn’t a peep.
7 posted on
05/11/2007 4:11:28 AM PDT by
wita
(truthspeaks@freerepublic.com)
To: don-o
Opposition to the abuse of women in the acquisition of human ova for research...Did I miss something here?
Is someone holding these women down and forcing them to give up their eggs?
This sounds like hyperbolic bull excrement to me.
9 posted on
05/11/2007 4:23:59 AM PDT by
OldSmaj
(Death to islam. I am now and will always be, a sworn enemy of all things muslim.)
To: don-o
Why don’t these stupid women just say no? They act like ther’re being strapped down to tables against their will while evil doctors take their eggs.
To: don-o
I’d just like to go on record here as saying I’ve never handled a woman’s ovaries.
11 posted on
05/11/2007 4:52:20 AM PDT by
Kenton
(All vices in moderation. I don't want to overdo any but I don't want to skip any either.)
To: don-o
I was wondering when the feminists were going to figure this out. They must be torn between the big money givers who would kill to get what they want(a child of their own at the time they might want one) and a shred of morals which might be hiding deep within them somewhere.
12 posted on
05/11/2007 4:55:30 AM PDT by
freeangel
( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
To: don-o
According to Dr. Diane Beeson of California State University, the global opposition to human egg-harvesting was accelerated by last year's revelations that Korea's Dr. Hwang Woo-Suk had coerced subordinates and exploited paid "donors" for more than 2,000 human eggs which were harvested, used, and destroyed in his unsuccessful cloning research efforts.*************
A hideous, evil disregard for human life.
14 posted on
05/11/2007 4:58:18 AM PDT by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: don-o
Biotech companies advertise all the time here on campus. They print stuff like “Earn $5000 Easy and Fast”. In reality, the procedures are very taxing with a significant risk of complications.
People opposed to it say they are taking advantage of ‘poor’ college kids who don’t know the risks. I say, let them do their own damn research.
15 posted on
05/11/2007 5:48:49 AM PDT by
varyouga
("Rove is some mysterious God of politics & mind control" - DU 10-24-06)
To: don-o
Look for a revival of the early 90s proposal to use the ova of aborted girl babies. The way these scientist want to run through ova, the paid donor supply won’t keep up.
Mrs VS
To: don-o
How about, “Hands off my seat belt!” I imagine most if not all the scurrilious baby killing hags were in favor or mandatory seat belts and air bags.
23 posted on
05/11/2007 8:36:40 AM PDT by
AD from SpringBay
(We have the government we allow and deserve.)
To: don-o
I’m really glad that both sides are able to find common ground here. Pro-lifers realize it is dangerous for women, but we also realize it is immoral to create embryos to experiment on. Killing or endangering another person for the sake of research or cloning is horrendous. The pro-choicers see only the danger to women aspect. Afterall, women are likely to be desparate and coerced into this for some easy money without knowledge of the risks to themselves.
26 posted on
05/11/2007 5:14:03 PM PDT by
Pinkbell
(Hunter/Thompson)
To: don-o
It's too bad that the reason the pro-choicers oppose this is because it harms women instead of the moral considerations of what they're doing to the eggs and human beings that are being created and destroyed for the purpose of *research*.
Nevertheless, if they'll oppose it, I can't complain.
30 posted on
05/13/2007 2:55:28 PM PDT by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson