Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bloomberg readying for a run at White House
Daily Telegraph (UK) ^ | 5/12/2007 | Toby Harnden

Posted on 05/11/2007 8:09:22 PM PDT by 1066AD

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last
To: dirtboy

LOL!!


21 posted on 05/11/2007 8:35:25 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker ( Hunter/Thompson/Thompson/Hunter in 08! "Read my lips....No new RINO's" !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar; dirtboy

No new RINO’s!!


22 posted on 05/11/2007 8:36:37 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker ( Hunter/Thompson/Thompson/Hunter in 08! "Read my lips....No new RINO's" !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 1066AD

A third-party run would be interesting


23 posted on 05/11/2007 9:26:35 PM PDT by LFOD777 (In 2006, Washington spent $2.7 Trillion and ran a $248 billion budget deficit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

I’d love to see that dimwit run as a third party. All he’d do is siphon off votes for the Dem candidate. He’s a loon, he might get some votes from “Republicans” in New York and Massachusetts but fat chance in hell the GOP would win those states anyways. Bloomberg in one huge gun-grabber, as bad as Hillary or Feinstein.


24 posted on 05/11/2007 10:03:21 PM PDT by LoneStarLegend78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: 1066AD

I think a Bloomie candidacy hurts the Dimmycraps. He’s very close to them on the issues.


25 posted on 05/11/2007 10:57:00 PM PDT by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1066AD
If he ran, he’d do the most damage to the Democrats. He could probably split the moderate and liberal votes in New Jersey and possibly leave New Jersey open to a real conservative. I can’t begin to hope that he’d do the same in New York, but he might take New York from the Democrats. He might hurt the GOP a little in Pennsylvania. He’d likely hurt the GOP in places like Rhode Island and Connecticut, but we never win those states anyway.
26 posted on 05/11/2007 11:00:10 PM PDT by WFTR (Liberty isn't for cowards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LoneStarLegend78
All he’d do is siphon off votes for the Dem candidate.

Being a leftist, one would assume that to be that case. However, if we hearken back to the Perot campaign, we recall that it was not so much Perot's policy positions that derailed Bush I. Rather, it was the fact that 100% of Perot's campaign advertising was ANTI-BUSH!. So, in effect, all Perot's campaign dollars were used to elect Billary.

Possibly Bloomberg has the same plan, ie. no real expectation of winning the Presidency himself, but only to spend his millions attacking the GOP candidate and thereby helping Hitlery win.

27 posted on 05/11/2007 11:02:48 PM PDT by rhinohunter (Even I have a better chance than Hagel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: All

This is great news. The man is far far to the left of the mainstream GOP and conservative Independents. It is hard to see how . . . if he gets 20% of the vote that it would be 10 and 10 from Dems and GOP. He’s running left. We’re not going to nominate a leftist.

In fact, if he enters the race I suspect Thompson does the next day.

A lot of folks try to pretend that abortion is not a litmus test. Well, it IS in the Democratic party. If someone is pro Abortion, they can siphon votes off of Dems.


28 posted on 05/11/2007 11:05:33 PM PDT by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: 1066AD

Bloomberg has been a major disappointment in New York-—I am 20 mi. over the GW Bridge,in NJ, and I’ve been watching him from Day One.
I still have NO idea what he is doing as Mayor.
It makes me miss the wild asexual neuroticism of Ed Koch,and I couldn’t stand Koch.
If Bloomberg REALLY thinks he stands a chance as a Presidential candidate, he’d better but a cap RIGHT NOW on his campaign spending, because he will bankrupt himself within 6 months, and he will find out even sooner that running for President is in another league altogether than running for Mayor.


29 posted on 05/11/2007 11:08:22 PM PDT by supremedoctrine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1066AD

A Centrist my ass!


30 posted on 05/11/2007 11:14:53 PM PDT by BnBlFlag (Deo Vindice/Semper Fidelis "Ya gotta saddle up your boys; Ya gotta draw a hard line")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1066AD
Just like Chretien used to say, there would be a real 'turd party'.

Mayor Bloomberg's latest claim to fame is as the ringleader or at least instigator of unofficial straw purchase attempts of firearms in various jurisdictions outside his own, in probable violation of federal and state laws concerning the purchase of firearms, so he can put pressure on the dealers of said firearms to open their records to his snoops in the guise of making Noo Yawk somehow, safe from crime.

Imho, the man is a criminal ringleader who has conspired to deprive citizens of the United States and other states outside his jurisdiction of a fundamental civil right, and has enthusiastically done so without evident reservation or remorse.

He is patently unfit for the office of POTUS, and would thus be a likely Democrat candidate.

31 posted on 05/11/2007 11:21:58 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1066AD

Republicans should throw him out of the party tommorrow!!!


32 posted on 05/11/2007 11:25:53 PM PDT by Finalapproach29er (Dems will impeach Bush in 2008; mark my words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Finalapproach29er

Yes, they should throw him out of the party.

As for the presidential race, such a candidacy might help us. While it would initially create the illusion of even greater opposition to the Republicans than there is, Bloomberg’s politics, which are not that different from the Dems’, would become clear soon enough even if not immediately. In addition, a New York mayor with a Jewish name is already presumed to be a liberal — which Bloomberg, of course, is. All in all, it would draw votes from Shrillary or any other Dem.


33 posted on 05/11/2007 11:40:43 PM PDT by California Patriot ("That's not Charley the Tuna out there. It's Jaws." -- Richard Nixon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: 1066AD
So, if he did run, who else's candicacy would he hurt the most ?

Ron Paul, Sam Brownback. Tom Tancrado, and anyone else that don't matter in the least!

34 posted on 05/11/2007 11:42:12 PM PDT by Bommer (Global Warming: The only warming phenomena that occurs in the Summer and ends in the Winter!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhinohunter
You're right insofar as Perot had a personal animus against GHW Bush (41). Does Bloomberg have a similar animus against one or more of the Republican candidates? If so, could be a repeat. But if he's just doing it out of an ego-trip fantasy that maybe he can win if he just spends a lot of money, maybe not. I'd have to believe he'd draw a lot more from the Dems than from the Repubs in actual votes, more like Nader in 2000 than Perot in 1992. He's not as left as Nader, but he's far enough left that I'd bet he gets more votes from nominal Dems than from Repubs.

A lot might depend on his Iraq war position. If Hillary is the Dem candidate, she's already in trouble with the moonbat base, they don't trust her to be anti-war enough. That's an opening for a "centrist" (gag) who never cast a Senate vote authorizing the war, to exploit.
35 posted on 05/11/2007 11:57:59 PM PDT by omnivore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: omnivore

“Ego-trip fantasy” pretty well covers it, whether Bloomberg hates any of the Republican candidates or not. I agree that Perot detested the elder Bush. But politically, the comparison doesn’t really matter. Because Perot had a significant natural appeal to Middle America, whereas unless I’m missing something — I can’t imagine what — Bloomberg has zero appeal to Middle America. I saw him on C-SPAN once, and he is a very charming public speaker under the right circumstances. He may initially draw real interest. But he won’t end up either getting a significant vote, or peeling more than a handful of people away from the Republicans. To put it bluntly, he’s an arrogant, super-rich, liberal Jewish New Yorker who has nothing in particular to boast about in terms of a NYC record — a brand (New York reformer) that Rudy has rightly pre-empted anyway. No sale, Bloomberg.


36 posted on 05/12/2007 12:31:32 AM PDT by California Patriot ("That's not Charley the Tuna out there. It's Jaws." -- Richard Nixon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Bloomberg, Hillery, etc “Centrist” (i.e. “Moderates”)?

Only by comparison with Party stalwarts of the old U.S.S.R. or the current leadership of North Korea, of the DNC.


37 posted on 05/12/2007 2:29:37 AM PDT by OldArmy52 (China & India: Doing jobs Americans don't want to do (manuf., engineering, accounting, etc))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: California Patriot

Considering how many Jews seem to have learned nothing from WWII Germany, it is understandable they still favor the Dem Party.

One is forced to conclude Jews are described by the term, “stupid smart people”.

I mean, way back when, there was this guy wandering around doing subtle stuff like raising the dead, water into wine, curing blindness, leprosy, walking on water, etc. and that was just too subtle for even the Jewish religious establishment to figure out.


38 posted on 05/12/2007 2:46:12 AM PDT by OldArmy52 (China & India: Doing jobs Americans don't want to do (manuf., engineering, accounting, etc))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: 1066AD

Another RINO?
Just what we need.
Other then liberal N.Y. and a few other silly places like that he hasn’t a chance.


39 posted on 05/12/2007 3:52:19 AM PDT by Joe Boucher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1066AD

We need to shoot him down.


40 posted on 05/12/2007 4:50:07 AM PDT by wastedyears (I was opposed to Rudy in the mid 1990s when he took my fireworks away. I was but a little boy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson