Replies

But his Hagen woman is billed as a pro-life leader (either she is or she isn't or she is confused). If she is pro-life, she should be pro-life. Likewise paleoPaulie. SCOTUS created this mess with Roe vs. Wade handed down with SCOTUS's usual total ignorance of the constitution. PaleoPaulie likes to pretend that he knows even more about the constitution than the fo8nding fathers or anyone else. He doesn't. If he won't even vote to stop interstate traffic in abortion performed upon minors and their unborn children or the other bills referenced by elizabetty at #6 above, then he is worshiping himself as a constitutional authority at the expense of the kids who ought to be deemed protected by the Equal Protection clause of the XIVth Amendment (which amendment gives Congress power to act) also using the Interstate Commerce Clause to effectuate each of those bills. No amendment is necessary although, given the track record of SCOTUS and libertarians on the issue of abortion, one may be ultimately necessary to get past their inability to read.

In other news, Mrs. Hagan and other New Hampshire pro-lifers would do better to choose among the pro-life patriots available rather than helping Al Qaeda's Congressional friend from the Houston suburbs, Osama bin paleoPaulie, surrender monkey extraordinaire. In that way she can avoid embarrassing pro-lifers who have a grasp of actual politics.

Where did Mrs. Hagan say this?

He obviously knows more about the Constitution than you... The interstate commerce clause was never about "banning" anything between states, but allowing free trade between the states.

I suppose you are equally sanguine about the FedGov using the Interstate Commerce clause to prohibit certain classes of firearms as well? Or that the eminent domain rulings were just peachy as well?

Buy a clue...