To: The_Eaglet
Now that’s an odd endorsement.
You’d think libertarian Ron Paul would be against government funded abortion but otherwise leave the decision up to the individual woman, ie, be pro-choice.
2 posted on
05/11/2007 8:54:32 PM PDT by
gcruse
To: gcruse
Really ending federal abortion funding would be a step in the right direction compared to the current regime that funds Planned Parenthood with our tax dollars.
To: gcruse
He has voted against many pro-life bills.
Voted NO on making it a crime to harm a fetus during another crime. (Feb 2004)
Voted NO on restricting interstate transport of minors to get abortions. (Apr 2005)
Voted NO on forbidding human cloning for reproduction & medical research. (Feb 2003)
Voted NO on federal crime to harm fetus while committing other crimes. (Apr 2001)
6 posted on
05/11/2007 9:05:15 PM PDT by
elizabetty
("Al Gore doesn't need to reduce his carbon footprint, he needs to reduce his carbs!" Mitt Romney)
To: gcruse
Perhaps Ron Paul is a Constitutionalist Republican, not a libertarian as many suppose. Not a libertine.
To: gcruse
This is the first time I have read Ron Paul was pro-life. He is probably “pro-life” the way Julie Annie is “pro-life” and that is not at all.
31 posted on
05/12/2007 7:21:50 AM PDT by
conservative blonde
(Let's call the Jr. Senator from Illinois by his full name, Barack Hussein Obama)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson