[streetpreacher]

He suggests, Trutherifically, that the US will phony up a fake attack by Iran on our troops (probably killing Americans, as we may have done on 9/11) in order to have a pretext to bomb the mullahs. So, you know, if Iran actually does fire on American warships, his supporters will know it’s actually all a contrivance by the US government. (As was Iran’s taking of British hostages, presumably. As was the Khobar Towers bombing, presumably.)

Hate to give creedence to Rosie and the Truthers, but history is on their side. Our government has done that on at least two occasions. And lest we forget, Clinton was not shy about wagging the dog.

That said, there's a difference in simulating an attack (Gulf of Tonkin), shameful as it is and deliberately killing thousands of Americans. And then to build your case on "fire doesn't melt steel" is well... kind of kooky.

[Sun]

RON PAUL Rep. Paul was the Libertarian Party nominee in 1988. His libertarian views have conflicted with his pro-life stance on many occasions. From 2005 - 2006, Paul had just a 56 percent pro-life voting record as he voted four times against a federal law protecting teenagers from being taken to other states for secret abortions in violation of the parental notification or consent laws of their home state. In previous years, Mr. Paul had a 73 percent, 81 percent, and 79 percent voting record going back to 1999, according to the National Right to Life Committee. He doesn’t think federal law should cover abortion issues. He opposes using taxpayer funding for both embryonic and non-embryonic stem cell research. (LIFENEWS.com)

More about all of the GOP presidential candidates re: LIFE here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1832317/posts