Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Racial preferences in the dating world
http://www.seacoastonline.com/ ^ | May 11, 2007 | Steve Penner

Posted on 05/11/2007 9:18:14 PM PDT by teldon30

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 301-309 next last
To: mamelukesabre


I’ve never heard of these ancient celts being red haired. They were called gauls back then, or gallic. This is why the irish language is called gaelic. gallic...gaelic...same thing.

Sorry man, but that’s incorrect. As an American of Irish decent here I feel I need to point out the fact that the Celts and the Gauls were two distinct ethnic groups of ancient Europe.

As a matter of fact, Gaul DOES NOT equal Gael. The words themselves originated from different cultures more than a thousand years apart to describe different peoples.

Gael is derived from a Welsh word. It’s what the Welsh called my Irish ancestors. It didn’t enter into use until after the time of Christ.

Ya see, it was common practice for Irish youth back then to hop the water and wander over to Wales and England to have a bit of “fun”. All harmless stuff really; just a bit of cattle raiding, pillaging, the acquiring of any livestock or young women not nailed down. ;)

The Welsh word translates roughly as “Pirate” or “Raider”.

Gaul on the other hand is a different word entirely. It’s derived from ‘Gallica’, if I recall correctly, which is what the Romans called western Europe.

The Gauls as a people were distinct from the Celts as well (for a time anyway). As a matter of fact, in the late iron age there were a number of Gaulish tribes that had been subjugated by Celtic invaders.


121 posted on 05/12/2007 6:25:20 AM PDT by jameslalor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: montag813

No wonder Seung-Hui Cho was so pissed off! He couldn’t get a date on a bet. Now we know what drove him over the edge.


122 posted on 05/12/2007 6:39:04 AM PDT by ABN 505
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: The Spirit Of Allegiance

Even by the “ evolution “ argument we are one race
Going back to the East African rift area about 4 millions years ago


123 posted on 05/12/2007 6:52:30 AM PDT by 1903A3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Caipirabob

Thanks


124 posted on 05/12/2007 6:58:14 AM PDT by Vision ("Blessed is the man who trusts in the Lord, whose confidence is in him." Jeremiah 17:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: gaijin
Often when white chicks play the "submissive" card to charge the white guy with SEXISM, they don't realize they're stooping to RACISM. It's really very condescending, this notion that all asian women are somehow weak...

I don't think it's racism. My feeling is that white gals don't find Oriental guys good-looking, so they figure white guys can't possibly find Oriental gals good-looking. By that reasoning, the attraction has to be based on something other than their looks, i.e. their submissiveness. In the real world, the most submissive women on the planet are probably Muslim women, with Hindu women just a little less so.

125 posted on 05/12/2007 7:06:24 AM PDT by Zhang Fei
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: teldon30

Luckily for Indian men working in America, they will have absolutely no problem getting an arranged marriage in India.

Guy I work with is a 37-y.o. Indian American (his folks were immigrants). His parents got him into an arranged marriage with a girl in India he had never met in person. Arranged marriages are the norm in India.


126 posted on 05/12/2007 7:06:46 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets ("We will have peace with the Arabs when they love their children more than they hate us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vision
I think it comes from white women. I've had about a half dozen different women dismissively drop the "submissive" line when talking about Asian women. They must believe not having the "chip" is submissive. Their loss.

That's what I've always figured. But Muslim and Hindu women have Oriental women beat hands down for submissiveness. My theory, in reply to another commenter, is that white women don't find Oriental men attractive, so they figure white men can't possibly find Oriental women attractive, meaning it's got to be something else, i.e. their "submissiveness".

127 posted on 05/12/2007 7:13:12 AM PDT by Zhang Fei
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: teldon30
The problem with Asian, at least Vietnamese, men is definitely cultural. The ones born in VN are imbued with a tradition that it is a man's right and duty to discipline his wife. Even second generation men seem to have the same proclivities among the communities with which I am familiar. Families prefer that daughters marry other Vietnamese and many do. Among the nonCatholics most seem to end in fairly early divorce. The Catholics stick it out longer and most do not divorce though some separate. 2nd generation wives raise their children with a strong desire to marry non -Asian men. Young men now often go to VN to find a wife. Widowers and divorcved men also tend to head back to VN for second wives. Remarriage is apparently almost impossible for VN heritage men on this side of the Pacific.
128 posted on 05/12/2007 7:13:41 AM PDT by ThanhPhero (di hanh huong den La Vang)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jedi Master Pikachu
No, they often come from bigoted parents.

I don't know if that is intended as an indictment against me, but if it is you missed. Stereotypes are generally rooted in some truth based on past history. For instance, pit bulls. I am sure that all pit bulls are not viscious killers, but because of the breeds history and nature that is the impression that most people have of them(even many that own them). If you disagree, why don't you start fearlessly walking up to every pit bull you see and try petting him? I bet you won't do that.

The problems arise when people take them to the extreme, and are unwilling to evaluate people or things on an individual level.

129 posted on 05/12/2007 7:14:18 AM PDT by ConservaTexan (February 6, 1911)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Isn’t there a vaccination for that? Oh, wait, that’s that other disease.


130 posted on 05/12/2007 7:16:50 AM PDT by Let's Roll (As usual, following a shooting spree, libs want to take guns away from those who DIDN'T do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ

31 flavors ping.


131 posted on 05/12/2007 7:19:11 AM PDT by Rb ver. 2.0
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jameslalor

>>>Sorry man, but that’s incorrect. As an American of Irish decent here I feel I need to point out the fact that the Celts and the Gauls were two distinct ethnic groups of ancient Europe... Gaul DOES NOT equal Gael. The words themselves originated from different cultures more than a thousand years apart to describe different peoples.... Gael is derived from a Welsh word... Gaul on the other hand is a different word entirely. It’s derived from ‘Gallica’, if I recall correctly, which is what the Romans called western Europe... The Gauls as a people were distinct from the Celts as well (for a time anyway). As a matter of fact, in the late iron age there were a number of Gaulish tribes that had been subjugated by Celtic invaders.<<<

SRONG!

Wikipaedia:

In English, the word Gaul (French: Gaulois) may also refer to a Celtic inhabitant of that region, although the expression may be used more generally for all ancient speakers of the Gaulish language (a derivative of early Celtic) who were widespread in Europe and extended even into central Anatolia by Roman times. In this way, “Gaul” and “Celt” are sometimes used interchangeably.


132 posted on 05/12/2007 7:19:25 AM PDT by alexander_busek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
Luckily for Indian men working in America, they will have absolutely no problem getting an arranged marriage in India. Guy I work with is a 37-y.o. Indian American (his folks were immigrants). His parents got him into an arranged marriage with a girl in India he had never met in person. Arranged marriages are the norm in India.

I don't think Indian (or other South Asian) men have a problem getting hitched. The problem is with Oriental (i.e. yellow-skinned) men. Indian men get hitched back home because that's what's expected of them. They could equally find Indian women to marry in the US on their own, but are far more traditional than Oriental men. So they obey their parents.

How do you figure that Indians are far more traditional than Orientals? The same way you do in the Mid East. Just how often do you see people dressed in native costume in the Mid East and India? Very often. And how often in the Far East? Just about never. They dress just like Westerners, except perhaps a little less casually.

Romantic love is simply not part of the Indian tradition. It isn't part of the Oriental tradition either, but has been absorbed from the West along with other Western customs like monogamous marriage and Western dress. India has done a much better job of preserving its age-old traditions. Which is why things like arranged marriages continue to be a fact of Indian life.

133 posted on 05/12/2007 7:25:08 AM PDT by Zhang Fei
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Vision

“As soon as I got my degree I moved to SoFlo and ran amuck, knee deep in Latinas. Now I get my wish every day.

I’m doing the same thing.(just saving up the money for the move)”

Don’t worry when the amnesty is passed, the whole country will be knee deep in Latinas and the conservatives will be a permanent minority. ( but don’t worry about our country, just have your fun)


134 posted on 05/12/2007 7:25:38 AM PDT by antisocial (Texas SCV - Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: The Spirit Of Allegiance
I’ve only dated girls from the HUMAN race

Why dogs are better than women...


135 posted on 05/12/2007 7:25:40 AM PDT by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Jedi Master Pikachu

Considering your tagline, what’s your take on the psalm that speaks of us being ‘fearfully and wonderfully made’ by God, as regards being hardwired to some degree in what we uniquely find beautiful?

Granted, stereotypes and bigotry greatly impact people....


136 posted on 05/12/2007 7:27:18 AM PDT by The Spirit Of Allegiance (Public Employees: Honor Your Oaths! Defend the Constitution from Enemies--Foreign and Domestic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

I don’t disagree with anything you say, the author said that Indian men were the hardest to match.

For whatever reason, arranged marriages don’t seem quite a common among other Asians.


137 posted on 05/12/2007 7:41:12 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets ("We will have peace with the Arabs when they love their children more than they hate us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: alexander_busek

Sorry man, but it ain’t ‘SRONG’ ;)

Since you quoted Wikipedia, I might as well:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gael


The Gaels are an ethno-linguistic group which spread from Ireland to Scotland and the Isle of Man. Their language is of the Gaelic (Goidelic) family, a division of Insular Celtic languages. The word in English was adopted in 1810 from Scottish Gaelic Gaidheal (compare Irish Gaedhealg and Old Irish Goídeleg) to designate a Highlander (OED). Gael or Goídeleg was first used as a collective term to describe people from Ireland; it is thought to have come from Welsh Gwyddel (Old Welsh Goídel), originally “raider”, now “Irish person”.

So no, Gaels are not the same as Gauls.

Your wikipedia quote states that ‘sometimes’ Gaul and Celt are used interchangeably. That doesn’t, however, mean that it’s correct to do so.

It might be a convenient linguistic shortcut for modern people unaware of the history of the tribes of Gaul and the Celts, but it isn’t necessarily correct.

In modern term, it’d be a bit like calling Mexicans ‘Spanish’ or calling Spanish folks ‘Mexican’. There’s some overlapping of history, geography and language over time; but they’re still distinct peoples.


138 posted on 05/12/2007 7:45:25 AM PDT by jameslalor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: California Patriot
I think it boils down to this: Asian — and, I would add, Latin American — women generally haven’t been spoiled by feminism or by the more cynical aspects of American culture.

Joke making the rounds in the Cuban American community a few years back:

Cuban mother in Miami having a heart to heart talk with her daughter and son, both in their 20's.

"My son, I want you to marry a nice Cuban girl so you can tell her what to do."

"My daughter, I want you to marry a nice boy who is at least a third-generation American so you can tell him what to do."

139 posted on 05/12/2007 7:51:04 AM PDT by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Wow, I’m half Filipino as well! (father was originally from Mindanao, mother’s family is Polish/German/British). I’ve heard in Hawaii, half Filipinos are called “jalapenos.”


140 posted on 05/12/2007 7:52:35 AM PDT by Pyro7480 ("Jesu, Jesu, Jesu, esto mihi Jesus" -St. Ralph Sherwin's last words at Tyburn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 301-309 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson