| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 05/12/2007 7:05:50 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:
Un, no thanks. “The very least that must be done to halt the Hispanic invasion is the mass enslavement, or execution, of the invaders, which must be followed by an American invasion of Mexico to enforce American language and values upon the Mexicans.” |
Posted on 05/12/2007 12:19:21 PM PDT by K-oneTexas
Excellent read. Thanks for posting it.
Then they will be invaded by a new set of barbarians. And the beat goes on.
Just so.
China assimilated Mongol invaders because it was a strong and ancient civilization with huge numbers, and the Mongols were eventually pulled into it.
We absolutely know, from 1,500 years of history, that that will not work with Muslims. They have conquered numerous great civilizations, and destroyed ALL of them. This includes Egypt, one of the longest lasting civilizations in the world. It includes Persia, the heir of Babylon and the middle eastern cradle of civilization. It includes India, another great and long-lived civilization which only recovered after the British moved in.
Mexican and Latin American civilization is a little more of a question. As you say, they have a brutal and selfish elite, and they have been plagued for their entire history with revolution and discontent. They have never been free for more than brief periods of time. But they are still a better bet than the Muslims. Not a good bet, however. There’s only 300 years of history there rather than 1,500, but it’s definitely not encouraging.
Marked for later...
There is an alternative proposition: that what we are witnessing is a Darwinian struggle between civilization and barbarity. It would not be the first time.
The irony of such struggle is that by the time it has begun, civilization has already triumphed. And triumphed to such a point that even the barbarians realize they have lost. So it is a futile effort to turn back the clock, to reject the better way, and to prevent others choosing it over barbarism. Only the few who profit from barbarism still support it.
Civilization has also reached a point where even natural forces are much less a threat. And this may be a saving grace.
After WWII, civilization overcame two of the factors that had kept barbarity at bay, starvation and plagues. On their own, this caused a great increase in the raw numbers of peoples living in still barbaric systems. Enough so that by sheer numbers they could menace civilization, the situation we find ourselves in today.
But we are not omnipotent. Influenza and other plagues are still to a great extent beyond our reach in the barbaric parts of the world, though we can much better protect ourselves from them at home. But unchecked through evolution, many are once again becoming a dire threat.
A dire threat to barbarism. Such plagues may do in a few months what we could not accomplish in years.
As a final note, plagues tend to attack from the bottom up in society, eliminating many individuals who are unsuccessful or aberrant. Besides the sick and lame, they also pray on the mentally unbalanced and stupid.
And in doing so, it may in the long run have good implications to our society, as cursed as we are with Moonbats, wackos and lunatics of all stripes.
Wow, must be nice to live in your fantasy world
Did we read the same article ?
Well stated!
BTTT
I fear much of this is true.
Your post is BS. Equating Mexicans with Muslims because some six degrees of separation parlor game is ridiculous. Equating an influx of Spanish speaking people coming here almost entirely for personal economic reasons with the designs of Muslims that want to destroy is equally silly.
Mexicans want to enjoy the fruits of our success. They're are way too many crossing the border uncontrolled. A small minority of them have leftist leanings and harbor delusions of Aztlan. Muslims want us all dead. Big difference. Relax and have a Corona.
Where does one go to sign up for the Free Republic Anti-Hispanic Paranoics club? It sure seems to have a lot of members.
Great piece! He is right too. If we are not willing to do whatever it takes to preserve our Country, culture and way of life we will ultimately be dominated. We have massive amounts of people invading this country who don’t care one whit about our Constitution or Western Culture. As amatter of fact many of them are taught to hate it and how evil the white man is. The numbers are what matter and all this multicuralism crap is coming home to roost. Western Culture has no political advocates but everyone else does.
I hope he is wrong, however, about our unwillingness to protect it. I am not sure though. People are “busy” tied in to the financial system. What he is talking about will take real sacrifice and I think as a society, as he states, we are past that point. Miami and Southern Fla along with much along the border are already becoming dominated by the Hispanic/mestizo culture. What is to stop the rest of the country from eventually becoming the same? Someones culture will predominate.
ping
.
When do you suppose Philip Atkinson will invade?
“OK, so how about thinking this through...let’s assume the worst, that we are invaded and taken over. Now what? The invaders have the same problems we do/did. . . . Then, we’ve assimilated them.”
How well did this logic work for the American Indians in the 1600 - 1800’s?
Remember that the RCC saved western civ via the monesteries. They were able to preserve much from the Greeco/Roman times.
Well, hi there, Dane.
Thanks! ;-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.