Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"Joanne Mock, left, and Beth Kerrigan speak to a reporter in front of the Connecticut State Supreme court in Hartford, Conn., on Monday, May 14, 2007. The two are part of the court case Kerrigan & Mock et al v. Connecticut Department of Public Health, which deals with same-sex marriage and will be argued before the state Supreme Court."

1 posted on 05/14/2007 9:29:20 AM PDT by Zakeet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Zakeet

They should ask the LEGISLATURE. That is where laws are MADE.


2 posted on 05/14/2007 9:52:07 AM PDT by weegee (Libs want us to learn to live with terrorism, but if a gun is used they want to rewrite the Const.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet

Having equal protection under the law is not good enough for the gays. That is not their agenda. They want to redefine marriage and to further bring the moral fiber of this nation into the bottom of the cesspool. It will not end here. Next will be demands for polymorous marriage, polygamous marriage, human/animal marriage, adult-kid marriage, until there is no moral standard that is objective and stable.


4 posted on 05/14/2007 9:59:38 AM PDT by Risky-Riskerdo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet

Just Say No to both gay Marriage and “civil unions”. It’s easier that way, and nobody is going to stop with “civil unions” anyway.

And in fact, it’s easier to justify banning civil unions than “Gay Marriage”. Once you say it’s OK to give same-sex couples “all the same benefits” as normal couples, you’ve conceded that there is a compelling state interest in having gay people coupled together.

And how do you justify not giving them the title “marriage” after you’ve done that? It’s like you are treating “Marriage” as a religious thing, and then enforcing religious codes.

There is not compelling state interest in gay couples. They don’t bind society together, they don’t propagate the species, they actually work AGAINST ensuring that children are raised by biological parents who have an inate natural desire to protect and nurture their children.

The tie of biology is strong, and cannot be denied. Look at how adopted kids seem to “know” there is a natural parent out there, and will so often drop everything to find those natural parents — it’s just what we want.

Government has a right to encourage the bonds of biological parenting, and there’s no point in giving any support to any OTHER kind of family.


5 posted on 05/14/2007 10:01:01 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet

Rudy is ok with it.


6 posted on 05/14/2007 10:03:21 AM PDT by DungeonMaster (Render therefore to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet; AFA-Michigan; Agitate; AliVeritas; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; BabaOreally; Balke; BigFinn; ...
Rule of law by the courts. Destruction of society by a few black robed Nazgul. Part of the plan, as noted on the thread.

Homosexual Agenda Ping

Freepmail wagglebee or little jeremiah to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.

Click FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search for a list of all related articles.

Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.

11 posted on 05/14/2007 8:13:46 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Only those who thirst for the truth will know the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson