Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pregnant athletes deal with loss of scholarships
Concord Monitor On Line ^ | 5/13/07 | Woody Baird

Posted on 05/14/2007 5:26:49 PM PDT by Former Fetus

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
Years ago I was teaching at a private Christian school that had a rule that any pregnant student was automatically expelled. I complained that all they were doing was encouraging girls to eliminate that possibility by "terminating" a pregnancy.

That said, I can understand why a track coach would do his/her utmost to discourage pregnancies among the female athletes. Can someone have a baby and a year later run competitively?

1 posted on 05/14/2007 5:26:54 PM PDT by Former Fetus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Former Fetus

“Can someone have a baby and a year later run competitively?”

I should really resist the temptation to opine on athetics, as I[m the kind of person who can sit inside and smoke cigaretts all day, but I would think that a year after prenancy one certainly could compete. Athletes come back from worse than preganancy all the time.

Except Rothlisberger, I don’t think he is coming back.


2 posted on 05/14/2007 5:32:54 PM PDT by jocon307 (The Silent Majority - silent no longer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Fetus
Can someone have a baby and a year later run competitively?

Of course they can but ................

members of the Memphis women's track team were required to sign a document acknowledging they could lose their scholarships if they became pregnant.

They know the cost................

3 posted on 05/14/2007 5:33:51 PM PDT by Popman (New American Dream: Move to Mexican, cross the border, become an illegal. free everything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Fetus
"There are guys on our team that have babies. Why wouldn't they have to follow the same rule?"

Really, the guys are having babies? For a college gal, I think she would have phrased that differently and applied some critically thinking skills

Funny, when a women wants to abort a child, the men are only sperm donors :)

4 posted on 05/14/2007 5:38:23 PM PDT by Popman (New American Dream: Move to Mexican, cross the border, become an illegal. free everything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Fetus
You are given a scholarship to compete, if you can’t you lose the scholarship, makes sense to me.
5 posted on 05/14/2007 5:38:40 PM PDT by svcw (There is no plan B.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Popman
I wonder why it is that these universities will pull the scholarship of a female athletes that get pregnant but do not yank the scholarships of male athletes who get women pregnant?

Not only is this rule a Double Standard put it also promotes abortion.

6 posted on 05/14/2007 5:39:17 PM PDT by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
...but do not yank the scholarships of male athletes who get women pregnant?

I would agree with that position if the male athletes signed an agreement that stated if they got a girl pregnant they would forfeit their scholarship

Not only is this rule a Double Standard put it also promotes abortion.

If males signed this agreement it might promote homosexuality !

7 posted on 05/14/2007 5:45:28 PM PDT by Popman (New American Dream: Move to Mexican, cross the border, become an illegal. free everything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

Only a scholarships male athletes can get a female athlete Pregnant-—good logic?


8 posted on 05/14/2007 5:46:03 PM PDT by ralph rotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Former Fetus
"Refusing to renew scholarships solely because of pregnancy smacks of moralizing," Osborne said,

Refusing to recognize that moral issues have practical consequences smacks of stupidity.

I'd say a baby is more important than running track. Do these gals and their lawyers think they should jeopardize the baby and try to run anyway? Or maybe that the team shouldn't cut them even if they don't run as well when "running for two"?

Reality is: Don't fool around with boys if you want to run track. Or, get married, have a baby, and have a life. These choices are not in the least onerous—they're both good, in fact. They just can't be enjoyed simultaneously. Accept this, get off those drugs that make you think that way, and be happy.

9 posted on 05/14/2007 5:47:03 PM PDT by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Popman

Really, the guys are having babies? For a college gal, I think she would have phrased that differently and applied some critically thinking skills


Of course if these guys are really having babies they’d never have to work another day in their lives!


10 posted on 05/14/2007 5:48:42 PM PDT by Grizzled Bear ("Does not play well with others.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

You are kidding-right? Its not about having the baby, it about not being able to compete.


11 posted on 05/14/2007 5:49:08 PM PDT by svcw (There is no plan B.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Popman

I understand that it would be tough for an woman eight months pregnant to play point guard on a collegiate basketball team. However, if the no pregnancy rule is based on morals then it should cover male athletes as well.


12 posted on 05/14/2007 5:50:27 PM PDT by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Former Fetus
I shouldn't have been put in that position..she said.

She put herself in that position!

Rules are rules....

This isn't about abortion...

.this is about flaunting the rules and not taking responsibilty.

13 posted on 05/14/2007 5:50:55 PM PDT by Guenevere (Duncan Hunter for President, 2008!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: svcw

You are given a scholarship to compete, if you can’t you lose the scholarship, makes sense to me.


Do you really think it’s fair to hold them accountable to their agreement when they accepted the scholarship? Next you’ll say they are accountable for their own actions!


14 posted on 05/14/2007 5:51:04 PM PDT by Grizzled Bear ("Does not play well with others.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

For the woman, pregnancy changes her body and she can no longer compete athletically.

For the man... no changes to his body, can still compete.

I don’t understand your question. It seems quite obvious.


15 posted on 05/14/2007 5:52:12 PM PDT by Shazolene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

“I wonder why it is that these universities will pull the scholarship of a female athletes that get pregnant but do not yank the scholarships of male athletes who get women pregnant?”

Not being able to compete in the sport you got your scholarship in is the same thing as flunking out of your major on an academic scholarship.


16 posted on 05/14/2007 5:53:09 PM PDT by PLMerite ("Unarmed, one can only flee from Evil. But Evil isn't overcome by fleeing from it." Jeff Cooper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: svcw
What about the men’s basketball player that blows out his ACL and cannot play for an entire season?

Should his scholarship be yanked?

The school stands no chance in court.

17 posted on 05/14/2007 5:53:26 PM PDT by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jocon307

Gosh. Did I miss a Rothlisberger pregnancy??.......j/k


18 posted on 05/14/2007 5:54:15 PM PDT by originalbuckeye (I want a hero....I'm holding out for a hero (politically))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PLMerite
Do injured athletes lose their scholarships?
19 posted on 05/14/2007 5:55:28 PM PDT by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Former Fetus
Image hosted by Photobucket.com and make her REPAY all the money spent on her dumb cow azz up to now too!!!
20 posted on 05/14/2007 5:55:53 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson