Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stone tells Haditha hearing officer he did his best
North County Times ^ | May 15, 2007 | MARK WALKER

Posted on 05/15/2007 2:26:57 PM PDT by RedRover

CAMP PENDLETON ---- A Marine captain accused of dereliction of duty for failing to investigate the deaths of 24 Iraqi civilians in Haditha in 2005 said Tuesday that he never believed from early reports that a violation of the law of armed conflict had occurred.

Capt. Randy W. Stone, 34, made that assertion during a 25-minute address at the conclusion of seven days of testimony in a probable cause hearing that will determine if he is ordered to trial by court-martial.

Stone was the legal affairs officer for Camp Pendleton's 3rd Battalion, 1st Marine Regiment in Iraq at the time of the killings, which were carried out by Kilo Company troops.

"I have never lied and have worked at all times to assist as best I could to shed light on what I knew and when I knew it," Stone told the hearing officer, Maj. Thomas McCann, as he attempted to save his military career. "The most frustrating thing is the reality that even looking at this whole matter through 20/20 hindsight, I know I was trying to help.

"My firm belief that there was no law of armed conflict violation was the foundation for what actions I did take as well as action I did not take."

Stone delivered his remarks in calm and clear voice while standing at a lectern. His comments were presented as an unsworn statement, meaning he could not be questioned by prosecutors.

The defense and prosecution will present final arguments to McCann this afternoon as the Article 32 hearing that began last Tuesday for Stone concludes.

Stone's case was the first of four filed against battalion officers for dereliction in the Haditha incident to reach court.

Four enlisted men were accused of murder for their roles in the civilians deaths, but that number dropped to three in early April when prosecutors dropped charges Sgt. Sanick Dela Cruz, saying his testimony at the court hearings and any subsequent trials outweighed his involvement in the killings.

Testimony throughout Stone's hearing pointed responsibility for failing to investigate the Haditha deaths at higher command levels than Stone. The killing took place after a roadside bomb destroyed a Humvee the morning of Nov. 19, leading to a house-clearing operation and the shooting of five men who emerged from a car near the site of the bombing.

Numerous witnesses who testified over the last several days said they relied on the same initial information as Stone in concluding the matter did not require an investigation. The first reports said the deaths occurred as a result of civilians caught in the crossfire during combat action between the Marines and insurgents immediately following the bombing.

This morning, Maj. Kevin Gonzalez, the executive officer for the battalion in Haditha in 2005, testified that Stone was an able and competent officer who had been instructed to rely on higher-level legal affairs officers to determine when investigations were necessary.

"He was not expected to take affirmative action," Gonzalez said.

The next step in the case is for McCann to write a report to Lt. Gen. James Mattis stating whether he believes the evidence warrants sending Stone to trial. Mattis will make the final decision as head of Marine Corps forces in the Middle East.

See Wednesday's North County Times for a full report on the hearing and the final arguments from the defense and prosecution.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: defendourmarines; haditha; iraq
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Marine Corps Capt. Randy W. Stone

1 posted on 05/15/2007 2:27:00 PM PDT by RedRover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 4woodenboats; aculeus; American Cabalist; AmericanYankee; AndrewWalden; Antoninus; AliVeritas; ...

2 posted on 05/15/2007 2:35:51 PM PDT by RedRover (Defend Our Marines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

I believe his carrer is over,no matter what the court says.

That having been said, he did nothing wrong and got caught in the switches of a political con game being run by the democrats and the Media.


3 posted on 05/15/2007 2:39:26 PM PDT by sgtbono2002 (I will forgive Jane Fonda, when the Jews forgive Hitler.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002

I think you’re right, but hope you’re wrong.

It’s a hell of thing for men who bleed Marine blue to end up losing what they love, no matter what Gen. Mattis decides.


4 posted on 05/15/2007 2:47:20 PM PDT by RedRover (Defend Our Marines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RedRover; potlatch; devolve; ntnychik; dixiechick2000; Grampa Dave; gonzo; snippy_about_it; ...

FREE THE MARINES
JAIL MURTHA

5 posted on 05/15/2007 2:55:01 PM PDT by PhilDragoo (Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

I met a double Blue Star Marine mom today, I told her thank you and good luck.

This is a bunch of hooey junk.


6 posted on 05/15/2007 2:57:27 PM PDT by lilycicero (SSgt Wuterich and his squad don't make deals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RedRover
I thought it was ridiculous when infantry battalions started going to war with "legal affairs officers." Now I find out that legal affairs officer can be charged because he reviewed an incident and concluded there was no breach of the law of war, but failed to demand an investigation on the assumption he was wrong.

This is just nuts.

7 posted on 05/15/2007 3:02:27 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

>> “The most frustrating thing is the reality that even looking at this whole matter through 20/20 hindsight, I know I was trying to help.

Unfortunately, the Hate America Crowd has an agenda which has no concern for truth nor integrity.


8 posted on 05/15/2007 3:08:24 PM PDT by Gene Eric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

No charges should be filed against Capt. Stone. Not one witness presented testimony that he was derelict in his duty, that I read. On the contrary with murtha, the news media and the NCIS many lies, distortions and half truths have come out.


9 posted on 05/15/2007 3:09:54 PM PDT by jazusamo (http://warchronicle.com/TheyAreNotKillers/DefendOurMarines.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
If you would like to help with the civilian lawyer’s legal fees for the
Haditha Marines you can do so by going to these sites.

Defend Our Marines

Lance Cpl. Justin Sharratt

SSgt. Frank Wuterich

Lt. Col. Jeffrey Chessani

Marine Defense Fund


Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

10 posted on 05/15/2007 3:11:13 PM PDT by jazusamo (http://warchronicle.com/TheyAreNotKillers/DefendOurMarines.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

I am afraid he is like the Skipper who ran his sub aground.

Fault or not he is done.


11 posted on 05/15/2007 3:13:39 PM PDT by sgtbono2002 (I will forgive Jane Fonda, when the Jews forgive Hitler.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

Is there anything the President can do to exonerate these men? Why can’t he, as commander in chief, demand it? And why has he not? Jack Murtha should be hung by the thumbs until dead!


12 posted on 05/15/2007 3:13:42 PM PDT by Paperdoll ( Duncan Hunter '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002; colorado tanker; All
More from the AP:
Marine accused in Haditha deaths defends actions

CAMP PENDLETON – A Marine captain accused of dereliction of duty in the killings of 24 civilians in the Iraqi town of Haditha said Tuesday that he never lied about his actions and did not pursue an investigation because he believed the deaths resulted from lawful combat.

“I have racked my brains for the months since I was first informed of these charges,” said Capt. Randy W. Stone, who was charged in December with failing to investigate. “I have never lied and have worked at all times to assist as best I could to shed light on what I knew and when I knew it.”

Stone, who was the 3rd Battalion, 1st Marines lawyer at the time of the Nov. 19, 2005 killings, spoke from the lectern on the seventh day of his Article 32 hearing, the military equivalent of a grand jury proceeding. It was the first time he addressed the court and his statement was unsworn, which prevented him from being cross-examined by prosecutors.

Stone, 34, said he was frustrated by the accusations against him.

“Even looking at this whole matter through 20/20 hindsight, I know I was trying to help and my firm belief that there was no law of armed conflict violation was the foundation for what actions I did take as well as action I did not take,” Stone said.

Stone emphasized a central argument of his defense that many Marines shared in the decision not to investigate.

“Those around me at all pay grades and in every niche of the battalion or beyond seemed satisfied,” he said.

The Marine Corps asserts the 24 slain were civilians, but several witnesses have testified eight were insurgents.

An investigating officer will recommend whether the charges should go to trial.

Four officers, including Stone, are charged with dereliction of duty. Three enlisted Marines are charged with murder.

About 20 witnesses have testified at Stone's hearing. Many said they saw no need for an investigation.

“There was nothing there that looked out of the ordinary,” Maj. Kevin Gonzalez, the executive officer for the battalion, said Tuesday.

The slayings occurred after a roadside bomb killed a Marine driving a Humvee and injured two others.

In the aftermath, five Iraqi men were shot as they approached the scene in a taxi and others – including women and children – died as Marines went house to house in the area, clearing homes with grenades and gunfire.

Among other allegations, Iraqi witnesses accused Marines of herding four men into a cupboard and spraying them with gunfire.

“I didn't think anything like that could have happened,” Gonzalez said.

Gonzalez said Stone was told by the battalion's commander, Lt. Col. Jeffrey Chessani, that the deaths occurred in combat so he “didn't need to take any other action.” Chessani is one of the four officers charged with dereliction of duty.

13 posted on 05/15/2007 3:21:00 PM PDT by RedRover (Defend Our Marines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: All
More coverage at the link.
14 posted on 05/15/2007 3:22:55 PM PDT by RedRover (Defend Our Marines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker

Every operational unit of equavalent size to a battalion has had a legal officer as part of the staff since the army reorganization of 1905


15 posted on 05/15/2007 3:33:14 PM PDT by middie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

Those who instigated the Haditha charges are traitors who should be imprisoned.


16 posted on 05/15/2007 3:33:30 PM PDT by stinkerpot65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: middie
Every operational unit of equavalent size to a battalion has had a legal officer as part of the staff since the army reorganization of 1905

In the 1970's this was an additional duty - in fact I don't recall anyone ever actually doing anything as a legal affairs officer. Certainly, no one was assigned to the battalion in that capacity. Do you have a link describing the 1905 reorganization?

17 posted on 05/15/2007 3:45:44 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Paperdoll
"Is there anything the President can do to exonerate these men? Why can’t he, as commander in chief, demand it? And why has he not? Jack Murtha should be hung by the thumbs until dead!"

This has been my point all along. President Bush is far more powerful than the traiterous Jack Murtha, yet he refuses to do anything. It's politics as usual. These Marines, and sailors and soldiers being railroaded by the U.S. military are heros. They should be rewarded for their brave service to America, instead they are left to hang out to dry. It's a national disgrace, and one cannot omit Bush from this disgrace either.

18 posted on 05/15/2007 3:58:46 PM PDT by CeasarsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: CeasarsGhost

I must disagree on a few points. The President will have to let the chips go on where they are, then he can make a move to stop the stupidity. If he stops it now, the dimwits, the MSM, and all America haters will scream “coverup”, and you know that as well as I do.


19 posted on 05/15/2007 4:10:55 PM PDT by geezerwheezer (get up boys, we're burnin' daylight!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: middie

Isn’t this (fairly) new for the Marines? I’d need to search back through post threads to find the info, but I had that impression.


20 posted on 05/15/2007 4:26:16 PM PDT by RedRover (Defend Our Marines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson