Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge extends smoking ban in VFWs
The Columbus Dispatch ^ | 05-15-07 | James Nash

Posted on 05/15/2007 5:35:05 PM PDT by GOP_Lady

Judge Extends Smoking Ban in VFWs

Without settling the question of whether smoking ultimately will be allowed in veterans halls and other private clubs, a Franklin County judge extended a temporary ban yesterday by one week.

Judge David E. Cain of Franklin County Common Pleas Court will rule on a bid by a trade association of bars and restaurants to keep Veterans of Foreign Wars posts and other private clubs from allowing members to light up.

The Ohio Licensed Beverage Association, the group that opposed the smoking ban passed by voters in November, asked Cain for a full trial to settle the question. The Ohio Department of Health, which wrote the rules excluding private clubs from the indoor smoking ban, wants Cain to rule more quickly.

Further complicating matters, the American Cancer Society is waging a separate legal battle -- in the same court but with a different judge -- to make the smoking ban apply to Ohio's 1,500 private clubs. The cancer society asked Cain to merge its case with the beverage association's; Cain did not rule on that yesterday.

"We bring a certain perspective to this since we wrote the law," said the cancer society's attorney, Don McTigue.

Health Department spokesman Jay Carey said that while the cancer society fashioned last year's successful ballot initiative, it fell to the state agency to hash out specific rules.

"We believe (excluding private clubs) was the will of the voters," Carey said.

While Cain weighs both arguments, veterans halls and other private clubs must order patrons to extinguish their cigarettes for at least the next week. Cain could make a permanent ruling on whether the ban applies to private clubs, but lawyers on both sides said yesterday that they expect the judge to issue a narrower ruling.


TOPICS: US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: ohio; smoking; vets
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
The madness continues...
1 posted on 05/15/2007 5:35:07 PM PDT by GOP_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Gabz

Ping!


2 posted on 05/15/2007 5:35:30 PM PDT by GOP_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady

VFWs are private. That judge has no Constitutional standing, but then, this country ditched the Constitution a long time ago.


3 posted on 05/15/2007 5:37:46 PM PDT by Risky-Riskerdo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady

The title you made up: “OHIO — STILL NO SMOKING FOR VETS IN VFW HALLS” was not the title at the source and had to be changed.

Please do not alter titles.


4 posted on 05/15/2007 5:38:09 PM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady; Gabz

More abuse of the law.


5 posted on 05/15/2007 5:46:56 PM PDT by sionnsar (trad-anglican.faithweb.com |Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady
So much for the 1st Amendment
6 posted on 05/15/2007 5:51:13 PM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady
Image hosted by Photobucket.com and this is how the RATS treat our Greatest Generation...
7 posted on 05/15/2007 5:52:06 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: Chode

Your are right, most of these folks (all vets, all wars), have dodged more bullets than sunbeams and if they want to smoke in a social setting, that should be their right! Especially in a non-public setting. If you don’t smoke, or are afraid of secondhand smoke, don’t visit your local vets club.


9 posted on 05/15/2007 5:58:20 PM PDT by doc1019 (Fred Thompson '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady

This judge has no problem overstepping his constitutional authority; but then again why should he? Everyone else in his profession is doing it.


10 posted on 05/15/2007 6:00:14 PM PDT by CeasarsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doc1019
Image hosted by Photobucket.com RATS delenda est...
11 posted on 05/15/2007 6:00:58 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Chode

Consentio


12 posted on 05/15/2007 6:14:06 PM PDT by doc1019 (Fred Thompson '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady

What part of PRIVATE does the government not understand?


13 posted on 05/15/2007 6:30:38 PM PDT by TheBattman (I've got TWO QUESTIONS for you....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady
Further complicating matters, the American Cancer Society is waging a separate legal battle -- in the same court but with a different judge -- to make the smoking ban apply to Ohio's 1,500 private clubs.

I've donated more to the ACS than to any other organization... They'll never see another dime from me.
14 posted on 05/15/2007 6:35:24 PM PDT by Doc-Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doc-Joe

I’ve donated more to the ACS than to any other organization... They’ll never see another dime from me.


Just make sure you tell them that!


15 posted on 05/15/2007 6:38:53 PM PDT by Grizzled Bear ("Does not play well with others.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: doc1019

If the Nanny State wants to stop NONmembers from smoking at a VFW, I might agree. Let the Members ask for an ashtray.

But respect our Veterans!!


16 posted on 05/15/2007 6:48:17 PM PDT by PizzaDriver (an heinleinian/libertarian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady
My guess would be that members of VFW's probably own more guns than the population at large, and that they've been known to use them in similar circumstances prior to this.

These veterans may opt to defend their country one last time.

17 posted on 05/15/2007 7:00:20 PM PDT by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady

I don’t know if it was used in this case, but in other ones, the legal angle was that private clubs still cannot expose their employees to secondhand smoke.

The way around that is for clubs to not have “employees”, but instead to have “shareholders”, rewarded for work in shares redeemable for money. The club owner retains 51% of shares.

Interestingly, this can be more profitable for both clubs and their “shareholders.” This is because the club can act almost like a bank with the shares, paying better interest than any bank, in the form of dividends.

So if the shareholders have any extra money, they leave it in the club instead of cashing in their shares and putting it in the bank. In turn, the club can invest the value of those shares in high-yield investments.

This means that the club has a big pool of liquid assets that can be used for capital improvements instead of taking out a high interest loan itself, saving it lots of money.

Best of all, a lot of VA club owners can invest through USAA, so they can get a big rate of return.


18 posted on 05/15/2007 7:15:52 PM PDT by Popocatapetl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

Ping all for us, SheLion, please!


19 posted on 05/15/2007 7:54:50 PM PDT by GOP_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady; Just another Joe; Madame Dufarge; Cantiloper; metesky; Judith Anne; lockjaw02; Mears; ...
Ping all for us, SheLion, please!

You got it!

20 posted on 05/15/2007 8:15:37 PM PDT by SheLion (When you're right, take up the fight!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson