Giuliani's words have hollow ring - Presidential hopeful keeps flip-flopping

National Post - Canada ^ | Wednesday, May 16, 2007 | Steven Edwards

[Jake The Goose]

Back at ya.

[Liz]

Don’t be disappointed——but actually it’s not that hard.

Thanks for the—ah—kudos?

[TommyDale]

“I do not mock people behind their backs, I do it right to their (virtual) face. Even if they do not realize how badly they are being mocked.”

I would say the reverse is true. However, you appear to share the same sense of humor as Hillary Clinton, without the smelly pantsuit. Have a good day.

[dforest]

Ah. No, in fact, I am not. I do not mock people behind their backs, I do it right to their (virtual) face. Even if they do not realize how badly they are being mocked.

Oh you must be one of those Jugalos. They can be mocked right in front of their virtual face and are too dense to see it.

[OKIEDOC]

dirtboy wrote:
So once again, if someone is a single-issue pro-life voter, you have the gall to compare them to Islamic terrorists?

REPLY:

Yes, I have lots and lots of gall when it comes to protecting my family, my country and my way of life from a bunch of loony, fringe, left wing fanatical, muck diving, sewer rat, Democrats.

I will guarantee you that is exactly what we will have for leadership the next four years if anyone of the current Democrat candidates get elected to POTUS.

X#^#X dirtboy.

A jihadist is not necessarily an Islamic terrorist.

The election of 2008 is more important than any election of our life time.

[OKIEDOC]

Pro-Life is one of my wants in a candidate also but I will not vote third party or Democrat to cast a protest vote.

The next President of this great country will either take us Right or far to the left, way far to the fringe left.

Bill and Monica’s cigar incident will seem like a Sunday school lesson if any of the current Democrat candidates get elected.

[dirtboy]

A jihadist is not necessarily an Islamic terrorist.

Once again, you are equating pro-lifers to Islamic terrorists. And that is an abomination. Especially when there are PLENTY of GOP candidates who are both pro-WOT and pro-life.

[Dante3]

Maybe it's just me - and I saw only part of the debate - but Rudy came across as a little creepy, perhaps not well. And McCain kept blinking.

And Rudy was his evasive self as noted by The Washington Times today: "Giuliani sidesteps social questions" (May 16, 2007, p. 1). He reminded me of the Democratic debate where all but two kept evading answering questions. I find it dishonest.

His support for amnesty is shows his lack of understanding or concern for WOT - another area where he is weak no matter how much his parrots 9/11.

[Liz]

Rudy came across as a little creepy, perhaps not well....his evasive self: "Giuliani sidesteps social questions" (Washington Times May 16, 2007, p. 1). He reminded me of the Democratic debate ....kept evading questions. I find it dishonest. His support for amnesty is shows his lack of understanding or concern for WOT - another area where he is weak no matter how much his parrots 9/11.

Rooty does NOT have the required poise, composure and presidential aura of say, Romney.

Rooty's deer-in-the-headlights look is very telling. He was VERY nervous having to answer tough questions.

Like he was thinking---"Hope I don't screw up like I did last time."

[TommyDale]

"Rooty's deer-in-the-headlights look is very telling."

[Liz]

Presidential ================= Post-menopausal.

[dforest]

Ha ha! Isn’t that the same look he has in the “Danthing With the Fagth” picture?

LOL

[ellery]

How do you figure? It seems to me that by pushing an unelectable candidate, your long-shot gamble is likely to result in the donks winning in 2008.

[Liz]

More like this?

[ellery]

The problem is, any statement Giuliani makes supporting personal liberty, states’ rights and the Constitution is diametrically opposed to his record as mayor — where he trampled personal freedom and violated nine of the ten amendments in the Bill of Rights.

[ellery]

I agree that the WoT is one of the most important issues of our time. So what candidate do you think has the foreign policy experience needed to effectively fight the GWoT overseas?

[TAdams8591]

I don’t like to say NEVER, but voting third party as a protest is something I’ve never done.

[TAdams8591]

That oughta scare the heck out of the terrorists./sarcasm

[Clemenza]

NOT Giuliani. The man has proven that he has ZERO clue about the internal machinations of foreign nations other than what he could get from a placemat at a Chinese restaurant.

Which candidate has foreign policy credentials?: NONE!

I will have respect for whoever can get Fareed Zakaria or even Kissinger on the line. Walter MacDougall would work as well.

[Liz]

Scarier than this?