Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sherpa scales Everest record 17th time ('Appa')
AP on Yahoo ^ | 5/16/07 | Binaj Gyrubacharya - ap

Posted on 05/16/2007 12:00:00 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: Proud_texan; wagglebee
Climbers still get surprised by the weather and die but apparently not nearly so many now as in the past.

I agree. The 1996 disaster was precipitated by a freak storm and failure to go down in time, which slowed and even halted the descent. But it was altitude sickness that killed them.

41 posted on 05/16/2007 2:06:20 PM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
But from what I’ve read, K2 is absolutely brutal even compared to Everest.

The nasty exposure on Everest Southwest Col route begins at 23-25,000 feet. The exposure on K2 begins at the very beginning, and never stops. That's what I've read.

42 posted on 05/16/2007 2:11:00 PM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
But from what I’ve read, K2 is absolutely brutal even compared to Everest.

I forgot to mention, Mt. McKinley (Denali) in Alaska also has a brutal rep for a couple reasons.

I'll just cut this from Wikipedia:

Mount McKinley has a larger bulk and rise than Mount Everest. Even though the summit of Everest is about 9,000 feet (2,700 m) higher as measured from sea level, its base sits on the Tibetan Plateau at about 17,000 feet (5,200 m), giving it a real vertical rise of little more than 12,000 feet (3,700 m). The base of Mount McKinley is roughly a 2,000 foot plateau, giving it an actual rise of 18,000 feet (5,500 m).

The mountain is also characterized by extremely cold weather, and by an unusually severe risk of altitude illness for climbers, due to not only its high elevation but also its high latitude.[2] At the equator, a mountain as high as Mount McKinley would have 47% as much oxygen available on its summit as there is at sea level,[3] but because of its latitude, the pressure on the summit of McKinley is even lower.[4

43 posted on 05/16/2007 2:15:20 PM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

44 posted on 05/16/2007 2:44:45 PM PDT by dennisw ("Libertarianism is applied autism" - Steve Sailer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

“piece a cake.. eh?

Any climber on the forum ever climb a big ‘un?”

Uh....yeah.....

But I PROMISED not to kiss & tell.....!!!


45 posted on 05/16/2007 5:50:36 PM PDT by JB in Whitefish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Spirochete

“But until Europeans came along, none of them had ever been to the summit of Everest?”

Europeans weren’t climbing any of the Alpine mountains either. And they are like ten times shorter than the Himalayas.

Americans weren’t climbing Mt. McKinley until the the 20th century.

The point of climbing a mountain such as Everest before it was technically possible and economically viable? Why would any sane individual risk climbing a mountain for no reason? At least, for the Sherpas, the mountain means business — so they climb or assist tourists/climbers.


46 posted on 07/10/2007 8:09:19 PM PDT by sagar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson