Fine. But I couldn’t care less whether Wolfowitz wins his fight to stay, because he’s shown no inclination to push for ultimate abolition of the World Bank. He’s acted like any other tax-money-distributing bureaucrat, even calling, recently, for new and bigger spending programs “for the world’s children.” Thanks, but we can elect Democrats to do that for us. I’d like to be able to keep more of my pay so I can do right by the children in my own family, thank you.
You really do know nothing do you.
You certainly know nothing about what Bush and Wolfowitz have been trying to do at the World Bank.
You know nothing of how he and Bush have tried to get at the corruption in the countries the bank makes loans to, and how many of those countries, particularly in Africa have admitted the problems there and praised him for his anti-corruption efforts and have at the same time been opposed to the attacks on him; while the Europeans, who want him out, have been fighting him on those efforts (because it is THERE favorite projects that feed so much of the corruption, so it is there favorite projects that require so much additional anti-corruption scrutiny).
But, you wouldn’t know anything about any of that would you?
You’re responses are always like a simpleton, with pat little know-nothing cliche type ideas that are not ever informed ideas at all - they just fit your fixed and uninformed view of everything that you know little about.