Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neverhillorat

Those two statements don’t go together. If Bush lied, then there was no gas to harm the troops. Bush said there were WMDs and there were.

Your cousin should sue Bush for “allowing” Hurricane Katrina to obliterate a U.S. city.


14 posted on 05/17/2007 2:21:36 AM PDT by Inkie (Attn Dems: Loose Lips Sink Ships -- but hey, I guess that's your goal))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Inkie
Bush said there were WMDs and there were.

THE PRESIDENT Now, look, part of the reason we went into Iraq was -- the main reason we went into Iraq at the time was we thought he had weapons of mass destruction. It turns out he didn't, but he had the capacity to make weapons of mass destruction. But I also talked about the human suffering in Iraq, and I also talked the need to advance a freedom agenda. And so my question -- my answer to your question is, is that, imagine a world in which Saddam Hussein was there, stirring up even more trouble in a part of the world that had so much resentment and so much hatred that people came and killed 3,000 of our citizens.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/08/20060821.html

25 posted on 05/17/2007 3:02:05 PM PDT by TexKat ((Just because you did not see it or read it, that does not mean it did or did not happen.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson