Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: All

Can someone provide clarity on this? The article above refers to human “eggs”. Almost every other article I’ve seen refers to a human “embryo” being injected with animal cells. If it’s an actual embryo being assaulted, this is a monumental level of depravity and a crime against humanity (IMHO).


5 posted on 05/17/2007 8:02:30 AM PDT by Rutles4Ever (Ubi Petrus, ibi ecclesia, et ubi ecclesia vita eterna)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Rutles4Ever; don-o
According to this version of the story in the Guardian, the bill provides for the creation of three different types of perverse, monstrous ethically sensitive human-animal hybrids:

The first kind of hybrid allowed under the bill, known as a chimeric embryo, is made by injecting cells from an animal into a human embryo.

The second, known as a human transgenic embryo, involves injecting animal DNA into a human embryo.

The third, known as a cytoplasmic hybrid, is created by transferring the nuclei of human cells into animal eggs from which almost all the genetic material has been removed.

I notice, moreover, that the law says they can't implant these embryos in the womb of a human mother. But it didn't say anything about not implanting them into the uteri of monkeys, cows, or pigs.

Words fail me.

22 posted on 05/18/2007 5:14:01 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (God bless the child who's got his own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson