Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CA Conservative

I understand. In this case, PPLA apparently claimed this violated medical privacy.


17 posted on 05/17/2007 3:08:26 PM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: doug from upland

Actually, in the article I read on this case yesterday, PP specifically cited the privacy statute that covers confidential communications. Although medical communications are included, it also covers any communication in which either party has a reasonable expectation of privacy.


18 posted on 05/17/2007 3:17:10 PM PDT by CA Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson