Of course the US is so heavily invested in the middle east because of oil. Where the US itself gets oil is irrelevant because its a fact that its a global market and every drop of oil that is drilled is used. If all middle eastern nations stopped supplying oil or dramatically increased the price...prices would spike everywhere
Ensuring a supply of a critical natural resource is certainly valid reason to be in the middle east...but the debate over whether we should be in the middle east should not be based only on an assumnption that, if the US leaves, Islamists will take over the region and effect the supply of oil to cripple the US economy. That could happen...but, that also assumes that (1) because the US withdraws from the region, the Islamists will be able to topple more moderate regimes (no guarantee of that since the greatest strength of the Islamists is their ability to exploit the presence of the US in the region and US support for what many Muslims consider illegitimate regimes) and (2) that Islamists would be able to for a sustained period of time disrupt the supply of oil (which would reduce the demand for oil and remember that they need to sell oil as much as we need to buy it).
We also need to remember that, right now, the cost of oil is more than just the $60 or $70 market cost of a barrel of oil. There are a lot of hidden costs the US taxpayer assumes to ensure the free flow (in terms of foreign aid and military support and the presence of the US military bases in the region). Add those costs in and the cost of oil now is more than we realize. We also need to accept what the US government wants us to deny...that there is another cost to the policies that try to guarantee a free flow of oil...an increased threat of terrorism.
And, for those who believe that we should remain in the region (or even expand the American presence in the region) so as to have access to cheap oil...if that presence leads to a few nukes going off in American cities that kill thousands of Americans and really cripple the economy...our efforts to keep the price of oil low by maintaining a huge presence in the middle east will truly seem penny wise and pound foolish in retrospect
You and Ron Paul presume to know what is inside the hearts of terrorists, and that is a dangerous thing. Of course the US presence in the Middle East irritates them, but that’s only one factor. And guess what? If we leave, they’re still going to hate us, for a multitude of reasons. And they’re going to continue to try to attack us, whether or not we try to stop them. If US presence in the ME was the primary factor for 9/11, why did it happen a decade after we left Iraq?
The best way to combat terrorism is to remain on constant offense. Perhaps forever.