>>Who’s standards are you referring to?
Almost everyone’s. There are clearly standards which already exist, that disqualify inclusion. More extreme example would be an advocate for say a reintroduction of slavery. This would disqualify from inclusion, as sure as tomorrow’s sunrise. But who’s standard is that? It’s a fairly universal one. The question therefore is does 9/11 masochism rise to their level? I think it does. But of course, that’s just my idea, which it’s why we’re discussing it.
>>And what about the individual on stage that made blatant anti-2nd Amendment comments?
As a second-amendment rights advocate I would wish that such a standard existed, but I’m afraid it isn’t true. There are many Republicans who support gun control unfortunately. But how many agree that 9/11 was the fault of the United States? That the United States had it coming? That the terrorists had a point? Few, if any. I think this is a disqualification.
Almost everyone’s,
Not mine. I never read the list of what is proper to say and what is not. Could you provide a list of the proper speech standards?
Like I said, blatant anti-2nd Amendment comments were made up there.
Shall we eliminate that candidate too?