To: Jim Robinson
By his transparent effort to find "middle ground" on the fundamental issue of human life, where clearly none existsYou cannot have half an abortion.
And if you believe abortion is murder, there is no middle ground.
2 posted on
05/19/2007 1:08:07 PM PDT by
dirtboy
(A store clerk has done more to fight the WOT than Rudy.)
To: Jim Robinson
...proudly was against Rudy for President, when being against Rudy wasn’t cool.
3 posted on
05/19/2007 1:08:25 PM PDT by
lormand
(Michael Wiener - faux Conservatism for faux Conservatives.)
To: Jim Robinson
I wonder if he’ll twist about on the gun control, homosexual issues, and immigration like he did on abortion for a while. Perhaps he learned from the abortion issue, and he will be forthwright like his positions. Although, it’s possible he didn’t learn and will squirm about until someone starts pulling out records from when he was the Mayor of NYC and quotes. We already have plenty gathered right here on FR. :)
4 posted on
05/19/2007 1:08:32 PM PDT by
Pinkbell
(Hunter/Thompson)
To: Jim Robinson
The only positive Rudy has is his willingness to fight the islamic threat...otherwise there is no difference between him and the Rats.
5 posted on
05/19/2007 1:09:01 PM PDT by
Cyclops08
To: Jim Robinson
“Among Giuliani’s other “Achilles Heel” issues are his support for same-sex “marriage,” amnesty for illegals, and gun control.”
4 reasons I would NEVER vote for Rudy.
7 posted on
05/19/2007 1:09:23 PM PDT by
stephenjohnbanker
( Hunter/Thompson/Thompson/Hunter in 08! "Read my lips....No new RINO's" !!)
To: Jim Robinson
Rudy Giuliani Has His Dukakis Moment The headline conjured up images of Rooty sitting in a tank dressed in drag...
8 posted on
05/19/2007 1:10:12 PM PDT by
EternalVigilance
(GW Bush has broken the first rule of Texas politics: "Dance with the one that brung ya.")
To: Jim Robinson
Next Rudy will be complaining of his miss treatment by the right wing social conservatives.
14 posted on
05/19/2007 1:18:46 PM PDT by
parthian shot
(I can't stand much more of this!!)
To: Jim Robinson
16 posted on
05/19/2007 1:21:04 PM PDT by
stockpirate
(IF BUSH SIGNS THIS POS IMMIGRATION BILL, I WILL NOT VOTE REPUBLICAN AGAIN!)
To: Jim Robinson
Uh, hasn't anyone noticed that what Rudy said in that debate could have been borrowed, concept by concept, from the last opinion that Chief Justice Rehnquist wrote on the question of abortion, before he died with his boots on? Obeying the Constitution as written is a "conservative" position. "Stare Decicis" or continuing the law in place as is, is also a "conservative" position.
Rehnquist covered both points in his last such opinion at greater length but to the same effect as Rudy did in this answer. I do not agree with the conclusion that Rehnquist reached, but I understand his logic.
Congressman Billybob
Latest article: "Jeffrey Has Escaped, and Other Tales of Divorce"
To: Jim Robinson
Compared to the implosions of other leftists like Dukakis, Kerry and Dean, Rooty’s was pretty pathetic.
18 posted on
05/19/2007 1:29:16 PM PDT by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: Jim Robinson
Ideologically, I'd rather deal with a liberal or (preferably) a Conservative any day than a moderate (which is how liberal-rudy is desperately trying to sell himself). Moderates don't actually stand for anything, so you never can tell where you stand with them.
rudy's fake moderate act reminds me of Eddie Murphy in Goldmember where he's supposed to run across a busy freeway. As he's standing amid all the racing cars, you don't know from the look on his face if he realizes he's being played for a fool, or if he thinks he's playing you...
19 posted on
05/19/2007 1:29:25 PM PDT by
rockrr
(09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0)
To: Jim Robinson
It must be frustrationg for him to run for the GOP nomination as a dem candidate. I won’t even call him a RINO.
22 posted on
05/19/2007 1:41:48 PM PDT by
umgud
("When seconds count, the police are just 10 minutes away!")
To: Jim Robinson
The leftwing mayor is just pure evil. No different than electing a Xlinton.
To: Jim Robinson
>>>>> he has claimed to support the confirmation of Supreme Court Justices who may well eradicate that “right.”
Wrong! When asked about an abortion litmus test for judges, his statement was that he would appoint “Strict Constructionists” to SCOTUS. Whereas the conservative right interpreted that to mean reversing a bad law that had no basis in the constitution .... by his definition, that means judges who will honor the previous court’s decisions -— ie. won’t overturn RvW.
Rudy is a snake! Understand one thing, he says what he means, means what he says, and will do what he always has. Don’t make the same mistake we did with W and interpret his statements to be what we want them to be. THey need no interpretation...just definition.
27 posted on
05/19/2007 1:49:44 PM PDT by
Optimist
(I think I'm beginning to see a pattern here.)
To: Jim Robinson
With all due respect, this article is just crap. Rudy’s position is perfectly logical: Roe v. Wade is a terrible legal decision. “Rights” are manufactured by the Supremes using the incredibly tenuous argument that the Bill of Rights has “penumbras” that allow the Supreme Court to create rights they think are appropriate. It is an obvious usurpation of the legislature. Rudy has pointed this out, and also stated that were he in Congress or a state legislature he would vote to make abortion legal.
I understand why people don’t like his position on the latter, but it is not a straddle or a waffle. Roe v. Wade is a disastrous ruling from constitutional perspective, so even if you are for legal abortion an intelligent person should be against that decision and the kind of judges who wrote it.
Its a complex point of view and I’m surprised so few on this site understand the reasoning. If it make you all feel better the Democratic lackey Chris Mathews doesn’t understand it either.
To: Jim Robinson
"Right you are, Jim!"
To: Jim Robinson; Liz; jedward; All
A Liz “classic” repost : )
On 9/11, I announce as the 9/11 candidate.
I would not even be here on 9/11 if 9/11 had not happened.
I own 9/11. 9/11 is my lucky number.
Even my dog is named 9/11.
And my wife has 9/11 tattoed on her thigh.
I get up at 911 AM everyday and retire at 911 PM.
I only buy cars that get 9 to 11 miles to the gallon.
9/11 is the lottery number I play everyday.
I live on 911 Ninth Street at the corner of 11th Avenue.
Im buying the 7/11 store chain and renaming it 9/11.
9/11 will be forever embedded in the memory of 9/11 post-America.
I shall make 9/11 a national holiday....thats why Im running.
LOL!!
52 posted on
05/19/2007 3:27:04 PM PDT by
stephenjohnbanker
( Hunter/Thompson/Thompson/Hunter in 08! "Read my lips....No new RINO's" !!)
To: Jim Robinson
It’s Clinton’s “Safe, legal, and rare” business all over again and we know what that got us. Nothing.
56 posted on
05/19/2007 4:02:45 PM PDT by
ichabod1
("Liberals read Karl Marx. Conservatives UNDERSTAND Karl Marx." Ronald Reagan)
To: Jim Robinson
Giuliani has got the Rockefeller Republican, John Lindsay Mayor vote all sewed up. Thats 35% of the Party, apparently, all the others, McCain, Mitt and the Crowd, represent 65% of the party. They are dividing the spoilers among each other. I think Fred or Mitt has the charisma to break out of the box, and tell the others to hang it up.
61 posted on
05/19/2007 6:59:54 PM PDT by
mission9
(Be a citizen worth living for, in a Nation worth dying for...)
To: Jim Robinson
Rudy’s toast, along with McCain and the rest of the declared field. Fred Thompson’s extremely effective use of the internet the day of the last debate sealed the deal.
72 posted on
05/20/2007 7:17:26 AM PDT by
hershey
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson