Skip to comments.
Candidate Ron Paul: Quixotic, or the real deal?
Star Tribune ^
| May 19, 2007
| By Matt Stearns, McClatchy News Service
Posted on 05/19/2007 5:22:40 PM PDT by jdm
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-92 next last
1
posted on
05/19/2007 5:22:42 PM PDT
by
jdm
To: jdm
Quixotic or the real deal?
How about just “isolationist nutter.”
2
posted on
05/19/2007 5:24:11 PM PDT
by
Petronski
(Ron Paul will never be President of the United States.)
To: Petronski
3
posted on
05/19/2007 5:26:59 PM PDT
by
jdm
To: jdm
He tore Rudy G a new one at the FOX debate. The goody-ole boys of the RNC sure can’t handle the truth.
4
posted on
05/19/2007 5:29:45 PM PDT
by
eternity
(I like IKE)
To: jdm
Despite what the Ron Pauli girls claim, definitely
Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)
LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)
5
posted on
05/19/2007 5:29:53 PM PDT
by
LonePalm
(Commander and Chef)
To: Petronski
6
posted on
05/19/2007 5:31:16 PM PDT
by
gunnyg
To: jdm
Ron Paul's objective isn't to win the Presidency - even he knows he doesn't have a chance.
He is in the race to make sure the other Republicans make a committment to our Constitution, and to talk about the real issues that are completely being ignored.
If only Republicans followed Ron Paul's path, they'd be in the majority and our nation wouldn't be having the problems we're have now.
So bring on the obligatory knee-jerk Ron Paul posts, Paul bashers, because when you trash Paul, you're trashing the Constitution, ironically on the very website that remains committed to restoring that document as well.
To: jdm
Ron Paul, a Michael Moore clone.
An evil person who blames the United States
for 9/11
8
posted on
05/19/2007 5:36:34 PM PDT
by
SoCalPol
(Duncan Hunter '08 Tough on WOT & Illegals)
To: jdm
Who’s his fat sidekick then?
9
posted on
05/19/2007 5:38:14 PM PDT
by
Rameumptom
(Gen X= they killed 1 in 4 of us)
To: jdm
Paul said, “I’m a strong believer in original intent” of the Constitution’s framers. To which moderator Chris Matthews, the MSNBC television personality, responded with a disdainful, “Oh, God.”
lol, well here is my favorite paul article:
‘Scandals are a Symptom, Not a Cause’
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1554737/posts
10
posted on
05/19/2007 5:39:07 PM PDT
by
traviskicks
(http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
To: Rameumptom; jdm
Whos his fat sidekick then?Michael Moore?
11
posted on
05/19/2007 5:39:59 PM PDT
by
Petronski
(Ron Paul will never be President of the United States.)
To: Clintonfatigued
12
posted on
05/19/2007 5:40:59 PM PDT
by
traviskicks
(http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
To: everyone
That’s an easy one: Quixotic. And confused.
13
posted on
05/19/2007 5:41:41 PM PDT
by
California Patriot
("That's not Charley the Tuna out there. It's Jaws." -- Richard Nixon)
To: jdm
Inasmuch as I admire, sympathize, and support his stand on Original Intent, we've had too many craven, myopic careerists march through Washington over the years and practically bury The Constitution Itself in a labyrinth of self-serving reinterpretation. The Republic would have to somehow dissolve and be rebuilt from the ashes in order to honor what The Founding Fathers gave us. To talk about the literal meaning of the articles of the Constitution now, is akin to closing the barn door long after the horse escaped and died of old age.
14
posted on
05/19/2007 5:42:44 PM PDT
by
Viking2002
(Fred Thompson in '08, baby!)
To: Petronski
How about just isolationist nutter. Do you ever bother thinking for yourself, or do you just jump on the Ron Paul threads with the express intent of regurgitating trite, brainless platitudes?
15
posted on
05/19/2007 5:43:18 PM PDT
by
NCSteve
(Trying to take something off the Internet is like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.)
To: SoCalPol
An evil person who blames the United States for 9/11 Nice that you've been duped by what the MSM and GOP establishment reported about Paul rather than hearing it from Paul himself.
To: Viking2002
To talk about the literal meaning of the articles of the Constitution now, is akin to closing the barn door long after the horse escaped and died of old age. I guess you'd prefer to throw you hands up in despair and burn the house down because it needs a major repairs. Talk about defeatist!
17
posted on
05/19/2007 5:46:23 PM PDT
by
NCSteve
(Trying to take something off the Internet is like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.)
To: NCSteve
18
posted on
05/19/2007 5:49:18 PM PDT
by
Petronski
(Ron Paul will never be President of the United States.)
To: NCSteve; Petronski
Which part of Petronski’s post do you object to? “Isolationist” or “nutter”? I think both are true, so I’m just curious.
19
posted on
05/19/2007 5:54:09 PM PDT
by
MizSterious
(Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
I have checked out the sites and people who support him.
I can understand why his supporters are in denial, it is dificult to believe this guy can suck in so many.
20
posted on
05/19/2007 5:55:24 PM PDT
by
SoCalPol
(Duncan Hunter '08 Tough on WOT & Illegals)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-92 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson