Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

...
1 posted on 05/19/2007 10:19:28 PM PDT by Srirangan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Srirangan
So far, Pakistan has received more than $5.6 billion under the programme over five years, more than half of the total aid the United States has sent to the country since the Sep 11, 2001, attacks, not counting covert funds, the Times said.

What the hell. Who allows this BS!?

We've paid Pakistan $10 billion+ over 6 years to do something they ought be doing in the first place.

I want to start getting a little pamphlet in the mail once a year that asks me what priorities I want my tax dollars put toward over the next year.

How much longer will the American people put up with a government more than willing to buy out the entire world when the entire world couldn't give a flying monkey !@#$ if something happened to us? See tagline.
4 posted on 05/19/2007 10:27:25 PM PDT by TheZMan (That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Srirangan

I could build a nice house for 5.6 billion......


7 posted on 05/19/2007 10:28:49 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker ( Hunter/Thompson/Thompson/Hunter in 08! "Read my lips....No new RINO's" !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Srirangan

“The king’s cheese is half wasted in parings;
but no matter, ‘tis made of the people’s milk.”
-Benjamin Franklin


12 posted on 05/19/2007 10:33:14 PM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Srirangan

This makes sense for 2 reasons

1. It gives Pakistan a reason to go against their best interests.

2. And this is important, Pakistan is a real life nuclear power a hair’s breath away from being taken over by real life Jihaddys, they have missiles that can deliver the nukes.

While the left whines about “No WMD’s in iraq” Pakistan has them, they work, they have a more than one of them along with crazies and missiles that work as well.

It is my opinion that Pakistan has been the target of Al Quida all along, a shake and bake nuke stockpile and a conflict with the “hated” India to foster unrest with.


15 posted on 05/19/2007 10:38:43 PM PDT by padre35 (we are surrounded that simplifies things-Chesty Puller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Srirangan

For $5.6 billion we should have had the right to send Dr. A.Q. Khan to Box City.


17 posted on 05/19/2007 10:43:34 PM PDT by Prince Charles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Srirangan

And we gave the Turks 12 billion and Israel 9 billion. Hell all this “aid” is equivalent to giving every Freeper a million dollars.


19 posted on 05/19/2007 10:51:15 PM PDT by Rightwing Conspiratr1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Srirangan

White House: Planned pay gains too costly
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1835876/posts

White House: Planned pay gains too costly
The Stars and Stripes ^ | May 19, 2007 | Tom Philpott

Posted on 05/18/2007 11:04:57 AM PDT by oneolcop

White House: Planned pay gains too costly

By Tom Philpott, Special to Stars and Stripes Pacific edition, Saturday, May 19, 2007

As the House of Representatives prepared to pass its fiscal 2008 defense authorization bill, the White House urged lawmakers to reconsider a host of costly personnel initiatives added by the Armed Services Committee.

Initiatives opposed by the White House included:

Bigger pay raises The House was set to vote for a 3.5 percent basic pay increase for January 2008. That’s 0.5 percent higher than proposed by the Bush administration. The House would continue a string of annual raises set 0.5 percent higher than private sector wage growth through at least 2012.

A 3 percent raise next January would be enough to keep military pay competitive, said the White House’s Office of Management and Budget in a “Statement of Administration Policy” on the bill, HR 1585, released May 16.

The “unnecessary” extra half-percentage bump in pay would cost $265 million in 2008 and $7.3 billion over six years, budget officials complained.

“When combined with the overall military benefit package, the President’s proposal provides a good quality of life for servicemembers and their families,” said the OMB letter to committee leaders.

Both House Republicans and Democrats disagreed. Rep. Thelma Drake, R-Va., offered the amendment, adopted by the armed services committees, to stretch the string of bigger raises out to 2012.

The Senate Armed Services Committee will mark up its version of the defense authorization bill next week. That committee is said to be more supportive of the administration’s view that military pay is competitive now and will stay competitive with a 3 percent raise in January.

Higher Tricare fees The White House is disappointed that the House bill does not allow Defense officials to raise Tricare fees and co-payments for retired military beneficiaries under 65 or allow implementation of some new set of cost-containment actions expected to be recommended soon by the DOD-appointed Task Force on the Future of Military Health Care.

The administration says fee increases are needed to sustain a high-quality health care benefit “by largely capturing the inflation increases that have occurred since cost sharing was first established in 1996.” Blocking any such initiatives this year will add $1.86 billion to military health costs in 2008 and more than $19 billion through 2013.

The House bill also would restore $200 million in health care spending that Defense officials sought to remove through unspecified “efficiency wedges” imposed on service medical budgets.

‘Fair pricing’ The administration “strongly opposes” a provision in the House bill to require drug manufacturers to give the Defense Department the same price discounts on drugs dispensed through the Tricare retail network that they provide to base pharmacies, the Tricare mail order pharmacy and VA clinics and hospitals.

The White House says “market competition,” not government price control, “is the most effective way to promote discounts.” Rep. Steve Buyer, R-Ind., reiterated that argument on the House floor. He said price-setting in Tricare retail pharmacies will eliminate retail competition and, in time, endanger drug discounts for veterans using VA health care.

Reserve GI Bill The administration also opposes a provision that would transfer oversight for the Reserve Montgomery GI Bill from the Department of Defense to the Department of Veterans Affairs. Proponents say it’s a first step toward raising reserve GI bill benefits and increasing them in future years in concert with VA-provided active duty GI Bill benefits.

The White House says the change would mean DOD loses control of a critical incentive program for reserve recruiting and retention.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ain’t no wonder there’s no money for the Troops !!
Ho`Hay gave it away !!
I have kin in the 10th.Mt.

Burn the border area !!


24 posted on 05/19/2007 11:00:02 PM PDT by 1COUNTER-MORTER-68 (THROWING ANOTHER BULLET-RIDDLED TV IN THE PILE OUT BACK~~~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Srirangan

...and all I got was this mosque-scented t-shirt!!!


32 posted on 05/20/2007 3:36:10 AM PDT by xc1427 (It's better to die on your feet than to live on your knees...Midnight Oil (Power and the Passion))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson