Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pollution, chemicals blamed for China's cancer rise
afp ^ | 5/21/07 | afp

Posted on 05/20/2007 9:20:39 PM PDT by Flavius

"The main reason behind the rising number of cancer cases is that pollution of the environment, water and air is getting worse by day," the paper quoted Chen Zhizhou, a cancer expert at the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, as saying.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; foodsafety; pollution; toxic; toxicity; yada

1 posted on 05/20/2007 9:20:40 PM PDT by Flavius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mom4kittys; Arizona Carolyn

you know the drill

garbage in garbage out

all for a dollar


2 posted on 05/20/2007 9:21:25 PM PDT by Flavius ("Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

A very sad situation.


3 posted on 05/20/2007 9:21:30 PM PDT by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kinoxi

thats what happens when you sqush in communist 5 year plan and 100 years of guerrilla capitalism into 10 years


4 posted on 05/20/2007 9:23:17 PM PDT by Flavius ("Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

You are right.


5 posted on 05/20/2007 9:27:01 PM PDT by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kinoxi
I am sure this is part of the problem but you also have to figure that life expectancy is on the rise and therefore cancer rates will go up.

This is sort of like why cancer rates have gone up in America, we have been able to treat heart disease and strokes very well, therefore people are living old enough to get cancer.

Just remember we all have to die of something and that figures don't lie, but liars will figure.

6 posted on 05/20/2007 9:28:57 PM PDT by LukeL (Never let the enemy pick the battle site. (Gen. George S. Patton))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LukeL
I understand your point. Chemicals cause Cancer however and the relatively haphazard distribution in China shows from what I have read.
7 posted on 05/20/2007 9:32:16 PM PDT by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

OR it could be their cavalier attitude toward their food supply.


8 posted on 05/20/2007 9:34:17 PM PDT by Let's Roll (As usual, following a shooting spree, libs want to take guns away from those who DIDN'T do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

wow, China might not be as big an economic threat as once thought. They are poisoning themselves. Sad in a lot of ways.


9 posted on 05/20/2007 9:35:13 PM PDT by television is just wrong (Amnesty is when you allow them to return to their country of origin without prosecution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

Yeah, I just look up what I guessed was one contributing factor. The Chinese life expectancy is of course growing. The longer you live the greater chance cancers that would not have happened had you died at a younger age.


10 posted on 05/20/2007 9:53:15 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

Yes I think longer lifespans are part of the reason cancer is increasingly the culprit regarding death in China, but the pollution in their major cities like Shanghai has to be seen to be believed. In the middle of the day in downtown Shanghai you can stare directly at the sun without a cloud in the sky, because there is so much pollution the sun is filtered out like looking through a thick, yellow-gray plastic filter. In a view from a high-rise hotel you are shocked to see how thick the pollution is that blankets the city. Much worse than even L.A.

Statistics — the country of China is adding the power-grid equivalent of two Californias per year, and is adding a million cars a year to their roads.

But the libs wanted us to sign Kyoto, and give India and China a pass — HA


11 posted on 05/20/2007 10:28:36 PM PDT by zipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

Sounds like China was really the one the Kyoto Accords should have conernedfirst and foremost and not the U.S.. Yet because it is a leftist political strategy and not really a scientific plan, the biggest current and future polluters get a pass.


12 posted on 05/21/2007 3:45:18 AM PDT by rod1 (uake)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius
Japan, The Land of the Rising Sun

China, The Land of the Chemical Spill
13 posted on 05/21/2007 3:48:06 AM PDT by starbase (Understanding Written Propaganda (click "starbase" to learn 22 manipulating tricks!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson